Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ALKOMONITOR

@alkomonitorglobal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

211subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004324295347
TypeChannel
Username@alkomonitorglobal
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alkomonitorglobal

Growth

196211203.57 August 2026 — 196 subscribers7 August 2026 — 196 subscribers7 August 2026 — 197 subscribers13 August 2026 — 211 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 194–213 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:08211+14
7 Aug 2026, 09:24197+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:02196no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:46196first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.2%
avg views ÷ 211 subscribers
Avg views / post
82.7
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held13 (31 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total992
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥735.0%
👍525.0%
420.0%
👀15.00%
👏15.00%
🤔15.00%
🤯15.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC26 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ЧТО ПОКАЗЫВАЮТ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ НА ЛЮДЯХ Во второй части мы выходим из лаборатории и смотрим, что происходит в реальной жизни: как алкоголь связан с микробиотой полости рта и кишечника, почему наблюдательная связь ещё не означает пользу и что показало крупное исследование FINRISK 2025 на 4575 образцах. Главный вопрос этой части: можно ли считать красное вино полезным для микробиома, если полифенолы и этанол действуют в

5 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC48 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Миф, который повторяют все «Красное вино убивает вредные бактерии.» Основание у этой фразы есть. Оно просто в разы уже самой фразы. Красное вино содержит полифенолы — большую группу растительных соединений: флаванолы, антоцианы, проантоцианидины, фенольные кислоты, стильбены и прочее. В лабораторных условиях часть из них замедляет рост отдельных микроорганизмов, мешает им прикрепляться к клеткам и меняет структуру

1👀1👍1🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC486 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ВИНО И МИКРОБИОМ Часть первая. Полифенолы, биоплёнки и ацетальдегид От автора У меня две профессии, и ни одна из них не микробиология. Юридическая научила разбирать доказательства и отличать установленный факт от красивой формулировки. Сомельерская — слышать, как индустрия продаёт саму себя. Этот текст стоит ровно на пересечении. Он не про то, полезно вино или вредно. Он про то, что именно доказано, каким методом

5 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC34 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🍷АНТИСЕПТИК В БОКАЛЕ: ВИНО И МИКРОБИОМ В этом материале мы разобрали рецензируемые исследования из Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Microbiome, Gastroenterology и других профильных изданий, чтобы отделить лабораторные эффекты от реальной пользы для человека. Что известно сегодня: винные полифенолы действительно могут мешать отдельным бактериям прикрепляться к тканям и формировать биоплёнки. Но это не дел

🔥1🤯1

4 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC41 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

250 МИЛЛИОНОВ БУТЫЛОК — И НИ КАПЛИ БОЛЬШЕ Четвёртый год подряд Шампань сама уменьшает урожай — и дело не только в погоде Comité Champagne установил коммерческую урожайность 2026 года на уровне 8 800 кг с гектара. Это на 200 кг меньше прошлого года. Четвёртое подряд снижение. И второй самый низкий показатель этого века — уступает только аномальному 2020-му, когда весь мир перестал праздновать. В переводе на бутылки

3 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC50 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

СНАЧАЛА СМЕЯЛИСЬ НАД КИТАЙСКИМИ МАШИНАМИ. ТЕПЕРЬ — НАД ВИНОМ Один и тот же сценарий, просто на десять лет позже В ленте FaceBook у нашего коллеги появилась шутка: однажды зайдём в магазин — а там всё китайское. Даже вино. Смешно. Ровно так же шутили про китайские машины лет десять назад. Мы сверили статистику OIV, годовой отчёт Changyu за 2025-й, данные по автоэкспорту Китая и материалы Château Changyu Moser XV. А

1👍1🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC53 viewsread 7 August 2026

АВСТРАЛИЯ: ТАРИФ СНЯЛИ, ПОКУПАТЕЛЬ НЕ ПРИШЁЛ Wine Australia отчиталась за год, закончившийся в июне 2026-го. Экспорт — 2,30 млрд австралийских долларов, минус 7% по деньгам. Объём — 598 млн литров, минус 6%. Ниже 600 млн литров не падали с 2004 года Двадцать два года 🤦🏻‍♂️ По рынкам: — Китай: −15%, 756 млн. И это по-прежнему рынок номер один по деньгам. — Британия: −3% в деньгах, −6% в объёме, 192 млн литров. — США:

1 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC60 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ALKOINSIGHT Изменение климата не создаёт искру, но всё чаще готовит для неё идеальные условия. По оценке World Weather Attribution, сочетание жары, сухости и сильного ветра стало примерно в 20 раз вероятнее в центральной Испании и вдвое — на юго-западе Франции. Для винной отрасли риск шире самого огня: дым способен повредить урожай, пожары — инфраструктуру, а повторяемость таких сезонов будет поднимать расходы на за

1 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC57 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В DIAGEO ПОЧТИ НИКТО НЕ ПЬЁТ крупнейшая алкогольная компания мира ищет людей, которые в ней разбираются 11 человек в совете директоров Diageo. Из них ровно один когда-то руководил алкогольной компанией — экс-CEO Rémy Cointreau Валери Шапуло-Флоке. Председатель Джон Манзони — выходец из BP. CEO Дэйв Льюис — из Tesco и Unilever. Ни тот, ни другой никогда не работал в алкоголе. И теперь, по данным Financial Times, Ма

1👍1🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC56 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

ОЗЕМПИК ПРОТИВ БОРДО Самое дорогое вино в истории убил не кризис.Его убил укол в живот. Евгений Чичваркин — основатель Hedonism Wines, одного из крупнейших магазинов коллекционного вина в мире — в свежем интервью описал происходящее одной фразой: «идеальный шторм винной индустрии». Мы решили проверить каждый его тезис. Не как поклонники а как фактчекеры и вот что выдержало проверку а что нет. ФАРМАКОЛОГИЯ. Оземпик

🔥3👍1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @alkomonitorglobal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 433,848 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ALKOMONITOR” (@alkomonitorglobal), 211 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alkomonitorglobal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.