3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 500–501 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 20:47
501
+1
6 Aug 2026, 21:17
500
no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:04
500
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
65.0%
avg views ÷ 501 subscribers
Avg views / post
326
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
7 (24 June 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
1,303
Reactions total
74
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
119 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
90
75.6%
❤🔥
8
6.72%
👏
8
6.72%
🔥
5
4.20%
🥰
5
4.20%
💘
2
1.68%
👍
1
0.84%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ملخص يوم السرد السنوي للقرآن الكريم | الموسم الثاني 1448هـ-2026م
الذي أقامه برنامج الإتقان في حفظ القرآن برعاية مؤسسة الإتقان للتعليم والتطوير، وبالتعاون مع #مؤسسة_جودي في محافظة #السليمانية،
للمشاهدة: https://youtu.be/rYCjtH1BxYM
#يوم_السرد_السنوي_للقرآن_الكريم #الموسم_الثاني
#برنامج_الإتقان_في_حفظ_القرآن
#مؤسسة_الإتقان_للتعليم_والتطوير
بفضلٍ من الله وتوفيقه، أُقيم في مدينة #السليمانية حفلُ تكريم الحفّاظ المتقنين، والذي نظّمه #برنامج_الإتقان_في_حفظ_القرآن بالتعاون مع #مؤسسة_جودي ، وبرعاية كريمـة من مؤسسة الإتقان للتعليم والتطوير.
شَهِد الحفل لحظات إيمانية غَشِيَتها السكينة، حيث تم تكريم نخبةٍ مباركة من الحُفّاظ المتقنين الذين ضربوا أروع الأمثلة في الهمة والإتقان بسرد كتاب الله تعالى كاملاً في مجلس واحد.
وقد تم تكريم الحفاظ المتقنين وتجديد شهادات …
في مشهدٍ قرآني مهيب، وبرعاية مؤسسة الإتقان للتعليم والتطوير، أقام برنامج الإتقان في حفظ القرآن الكريم، وبالتعاون مع #مؤسسة_جودي في محافظة #السليمانية، فعالية #يوم_السرد_السنوي_للقرآن_الكريم
في #الموسم_الثاني لعام 1448هـ – 2026م.
وشهدت الفعالية مشاركة نخبةٍ من #الحفاظ_المتقنين القادمين من مختلف المحافظات العراقية، الذين اجتمعوا على مائدة القرآن الكريم، ليُنجزوا #سرد_القرآن_الكريم_كاملًا في جلسة واحدة، في صورةٍ تجسد…
نظمت مؤسسة الإتقان للتعليم والتطوير ورشة تخصصية بعنوان: "الطريقة المثلى لتدريس كتاب #القاعدة_العراقية_في_أحكام_التلاوة (وفق تحديثات الطبعة الرابعة)".
الفئة المستهدفة هم نخبة من طلاب ومدرسي #برنامج_الإتقان_في_حفظ_القرآن
تشرفنا بتقديم هذه الورشة من قبل الأستاذ الدكتور صهيب محمد الراوي، الذي أثرى اللقاء بخبراته العلمية وتوضيحاته الدقيقة بشأن التحديثات المنهجية الأخيرة، بما يسهم في رفع كفاءة التدريس والتلقي.
💡 لمحات م…
تعلن مؤسسة الإتقان للتعليم والتطوير، بالتعاون مع مقرأة الدرة المضية،
فتح باب التسجيل للدورة العلمية التخصصية لقراءة ومدارسة كتاب:
📖 «#تقريب_النبأ_العظيم»
للدكتور محمد عبد الله دراز (رحمه الله)
فرصة ذهبية للغوص في أعماق الإعجاز القرآني وفهم مقاصده بأسلوب علمي رصين وميسّر.
📌 تفاصيل الدورة:
نوع الدورة: حضورية، للرجال فقط.
المدة: 4 محاضرات فقط (بواقع محاضرة واحدة أسبوعياً).
موعد الانطلاق: الأحد، الموافق 5 / 7 / 2026.…
أقامت مؤسسة الإتقان للتعليم والتطوير،
بالتعاون مع مركز نبينا محمد (ﷺ) لتعليم وتحفيظ القرآن الكريم، الورشة العلمية رقم (2) في شرح كتاب #القاعدة_العراقية_في_أحكام_التلاوة،
وذلك يوم الجمعة الموافق 26-6-2026م
في مقر المركز بمدينة #أربيل .
وقام بتقديم الورشة الدكتور صهيب محمد الراوي،
وقد هدفت الورشة إلى التعريف بمنهج كتاب القاعدة العراقية وأصولها التعليمية، وبيان أهم القواعد والمهارات المتعلقة بتصحيح التلاوة وتحسين الأ…
ضمن جهودها في تنمية القدرات الشخصية وبناء الوعي التخطيطي، أقامت مؤسسة الإتقان للتعليم والتطوير ورشة “التخطيط الاستراتيجي الشخصي” (الدفعة الثانية)، والتي قدمها المدرب الدولي د. عمر عواد التميمي،
وقد تناولت الورشة مفاهيم التخطيط الاستراتيجي الشخصي وأهميته في رسم الأهداف وصناعة الرؤية المستقبلية، مع استعراض عدد من الأدوات والأساليب العملية التي تساعد المشاركين على بناء خطط شخصية واضحة وواقعية.
وفي ختام الورشة، تم توزي…
❤7👏4
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @alitqanorg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 15,744 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مؤسسة الإتقان للتعليم والتطوير” (@alitqanorg), 501 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alitqanorg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.