Кому VIP-билеты на мощное шоу Шакиры в Мадриде?

Channel
PRO.ТРАНСФОРМАЦИИ 🧠 | Алина Леликова
@alinapromentoring
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
312subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001308417043 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alinapromentoring |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alinapromentoring |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 312 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 313 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 313 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.29%
- avg views ÷ 312 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 29.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (18 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 29 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
69 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 29 | 42.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 17 | 24.6% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 10.1% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 8.70% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥2🥰1😍1
Я походу перешла на новую ветку вероятности за эти дни… Расставание, аскеза, принятые решения, возвращение к себе по итогу дали результат быстрее, чем я ожидала… Походу расставания все таки не случилось, а случился переход на новый ебейший уровень 🤪🤭 Допроживаю…и расскажу потом. История, пиздец, мощнейшая конечно сейчас проживается!
❤🔥7🔥1🥰1
Как мыслят админы этой игры? 🔮🪄 — До конца 👆 @juliana_lightwarrior
Сразу скажу, как берешь аскезу, с 1го же дня начинаются проверки… Сегодняшний день не исключение. Уххх, вот это прям начинается трансформация у меня… 🫠🫠🫠🫠
🔥1
После последнего расставания я ощутила серьезный прилив энергии и желания действовать исключительно в СВОИХ интересах. ❤️ Сегодня занялась организацией и стратегией плана на ближайший месяц, чтобы фокусно и дисциплинированно двигаться к своим целям. Поэтому в июле я решила: - поставить регулярные фиксированные тренировки и игры по паделу (чтобы прям в календаре стояло на месяц вперед) - делать тесты по теории на пр…
❤🔥5👍2🔥2🤩1
Я думаю, что тут в одном вопросе несколько тем разных сплетены и не всегда их нужно в куче рассматривать. Давайте честно, безусловно вас любит только ребенок ваш. Отношения мужчины и женщины всегда строятся на некоторых условиях: эмоциональная, интеллектуальная и физическая связь/совместимость, материальные аспекты тоже туда. Если на тот или ином уровне проседает, то рано или поздно это становится причиной конфликт…
👍2
💬 У тебя новое сообщение! Как Вы считаете, мужчина, который говорит, что ты для него уже не так привлекательна как раньше (несколько лет назад), в силу своего возраста, не способен на безусловную любовь? Как Вы относитесь к таким высказываниям? ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
Я знала, что тема отношений триггерная в целом и всем интересно посплетничать, но не думала, что будет столько активности и реакций (что в тг, что в инсте - охваты в космос полетели) Я не планирую эту тему в принципе мусолить. Так, на импульсе просто решила поделиться. Но мне приятно, что столько новых людей пришли в канал)) Будто теперь надо снова его вести😀😀😀😀 Можете задать вопросы, если хотите, поотвечаю тут г…
👍1
Знаете, я вчера рассталась со своим мужчиной, с которым была примерно полгода. И интересное наблюдение, что основная причина - это его недоверие. Если смотреть шире, то не недоверие ко мне лично, а в целом к жизни. Когда человек пытается все и всех контролировать - это всегда приводит к херне полной. А по сути своей тоже контролер, но я за последние годы так раскачала навык принятия и доверия, что это стало моей …
🔥11🥰4👍1😍1
Как выглядит идеальное «доброе утро» после 7 месяцев ожидания Мне одобрили рабочий ВНЖ на 4 года 🥳🥳🥳😭😭😭
🔥7👏2
Искренний подкаст про главные инсайты этого года про отношения 💔
🔥5🌚1😘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @alinapromentoring. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PRO.ТРАНСФОРМАЦИИ 🧠 | Алина Леликова” (@alinapromentoring), 312 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alinapromentoring.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.