а вы чей автограф храните?
🔥7❤2🏆1

Channel
@alina_gabdullina
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
696subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001851250449 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alina_gabdullina |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alina_gabdullina |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 696 | +2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:35 | 694 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 697 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 698 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 703 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 703 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 24 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
248 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 101 | 40.7% | |
| custom 5470015260935092770 | 37 | 14.9% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 12.9% | |
| 🏆 | 28 | 11.3% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 7.26% | |
| custom 5469937397472983188 | 17 | 6.85% | |
| 🕊 | 12 | 4.84% | |
| custom 5469638484929048300 | 3 | 1.21% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 248 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
а вы чей автограф храните?
🔥7❤2🏆1
Как мы устроили тренировку с Овечкиным и Кищук от ULTIMA Вы знаете, что этой весной я пришла в Яндекс и начала работать над маркетингом Ультимы. Какой парадокс: в премиуме сложнее всего вызывать эмоции. Богатый опыт притупляет рецепторы, и ты даже не запоминаешь очередную рекламу, потому что кажется, что всё уже было. Поэтому мы решили показывать сервис через создание воспоминаний на всю жизнь. Очень уважаю Катю к…
❤12🏆6🔥5custom 54700152609350927702
вы бы знали, какое у меня нереальное чувство вины после 2 месяцев паузы не расходитесь, сегодня расскажу историю
❤15🕊4🏆1custom 54696384849290483001custom 54699373974729831881
админ снова работает интегрировали ultima в перформанс в театре маяковского. показ делала команда @performa_moscow, а мы поддержали тематику и сообразили зону как партнеры
custom 547001526093509277021❤7🏆3custom 54699373974729831881
что делать, когда хочешь животных, но работаешь 24/7? у друзей-соседей как всегда 🤍
custom 547001526093509277011❤3custom 54699373974729831883🕊1
ночные заметки вернулись
❤3custom 54700152609350927702🕊1
Давно я столько не общалась Знаете, кто бы что не говорил, но работать в IT-компании, сервисами которой мы все с вами пользуемся, когда ты вырос в андерграунде и собирал себя из того что было — это другое. Я даже не знаю, как объяснить. Это не плохо и не хорошо. Но ощущение жизни явно меняется. Проблемы кажутся микро (хотя в моменте они были такими макро). Тебе открывается миллион возможностей, вместе с которыми пос…
❤18🕊4💯2🔥2
как ваши дела? от 1 до 10
💯7
причина, по которой я офлайн 2
🏆5🕊2custom 54696384849290483002❤1
причина, по которой я офлайн 1
🏆9🔥4❤3💯1
Жесть. Админ вышел на новый круг, а посты не делает. Отписка! Если вы так подумали, я вас понимаю. Причина моей паузы — настолько радикальные перемены в жизни, что слов не находилось. Когда-нибудь я приду домой в крайне уязвимом состоянии и выдам тут целый подкаст. А пока, делюсь тем, что не обнажает мою душу, но тоже является важным. Присоединилась к команде Ultima Яндекс Go. Здесь отвечаю за партнерства, коммьюни…
❤26🔥14💯8custom 54699373974729831884
админ вернулся в москву! - телега лагает значительно хуже, чем в питере - бойлер в старом фонде не тянет горячую воду (приехали) - новая работа ощущается как первый день на земле (скоро расскажу)
❤11custom 54699373974729831888🏆3custom 54700152609350927701
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @alina_gabdullina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“alina gabdullina” (@alina_gabdullina), 696 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alina_gabdullina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.