Channel
@alina_chillout_english
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
889subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001208194271 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alina_chillout_english |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alina_chillout_english |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 889 | +6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 883 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 881 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 879 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
238 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 126 | 52.9% | |
| 🔥 | 62 | 26.1% | |
| custom 5300935755839854273 | 39 | 16.4% | |
| custom 5413657760933880470 | 9 | 3.78% | |
| custom 5328205125972403196 | 1 | 0.42% | |
| custom 5424972835095329742 | 1 | 0.42% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Завтра, в субботу 22 августа в 12:00, буду - не поверите - проводить офлайн мероприятие в библиотеке (в рамках дня открытых дверей). Кто соскучился - приходите, будем играть в квизы про разные страны и рассказывать все новости, новый знакомствам тоже буду рада🌏💕 Только запишитесь @alinaenglishkids🥰
❤19custom 53009357558398542731custom 54249728350953297421
Настоящие Кембриджские сертификаты о присвоенном уровне выглядят так😍 Наши приехали почтой из Турции, где мы сдавали. 5 за чтение+письмо, 5 за понимание на слух и 5 за устную речь. У всех!
🔥22❤4custom 53009357558398542733custom 54136577609338804702
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥8custom 53009357558398542732❤1
Если я никак не могу ответить на сообщение, значит, видимо, я в подъезде выдаю Кембриджский сертификат⚡️ Потому что судьба меня наградила такими потрясающими заинтересованными английским детьми и родителями❤️
❤8🔥4custom 53282051259724031961custom 54136577609338804701
У меня сейчас активно идут знакомства для занятий в учебном году, и я так страдаю, когда вижу очередной провал... Но давайте по порядку У меня высшее лингвистическое образование, и один из главных вопросов наших профессоров на протяжении всех 5 лет в университете был такой: "Можно ли отделить язык от мышления или они неразрывно связаны? Что из них появилось раньше?" А вообще, как вы считаете, мы ведь думаем на родно…
❤47🔥9custom 54136577609338804702custom 53009357558398542731
Пришло время рассказать, как всё было на третьем раунде олимпиады, куда мы с моими 4 учениками съездили. Во-первых, мне сказали, что я могу гордиться: так-то из 30 человек второго городского тура прошли 7, и 4 из них мои. Успех🤌 Во-вторых, я безумно рада, что все четверо оказались легкими на подъем и приехали в Баку! Это было нелегко для всех, учитывая планы на лето) Вы хотите знать, прошел ли кто-то в финал? Никт…
custom 530093575583985427332❤28🔥9custom 54136577609338804704
Video message, posted without a caption
❤19🔥10
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @alina_chillout_english. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chillout_english” (@alina_chillout_english), 889 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alina_chillout_english.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.