Такой контент принимаем?👉🏻👈🏻 Пока у вас данный видеоролик длится 3 часа, напишу для вас, что я прочитала не так давно и расскажу, что начну читать…
custom 519283179836671721533custom 528097574144025150314custom 531024237873965371114

Channel
@alin_sinchuk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
474subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002163686919 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alin_sinchuk |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alin_sinchuk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 474 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 476 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 485 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 485 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 31 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
395 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5192831798366717215 | 167 | 42.3% | |
| custom 5280975741440251503 | 131 | 33.2% | |
| custom 5310242378739653711 | 97 | 24.6% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 395reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2026 to 13 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alin_sinchuk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 January 2026 to 13 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Такой контент принимаем?👉🏻👈🏻 Пока у вас данный видеоролик длится 3 часа, напишу для вас, что я прочитала не так давно и расскажу, что начну читать…
custom 519283179836671721533custom 528097574144025150314custom 531024237873965371114
Февраль и март состоят из спонтанных и долгожданных встреч, особенно с моей Зариночкой! переезда в новую квартиру, полной свободы и рабочих офисных будней🤩 Честно, стараюсь читать, но пока что получается плохо, ха-ха! Посты будут теперь почаще, я освоилась на работе🐈⬛
custom 528097574144025150334custom 519283179836671721523custom 531024237873965371119
Мои и так небольшие февральские планы, кажется, пройдут мимо меня😢 Я вышла работать на пятидневку и пока вообще не успеваю читать, вливаюсь в новый режим! Думаю, я скоро привыкну и буду читать почти в прежнем темпе, хотя бы книгу в неделю🌸 а пока я застряла с Кафкой, надеюсь уже в ближайшие два дня дочитать! Что у вас по февральским планам?
custom 519283179836671721533custom 528097574144025150318custom 531024237873965371112
Такие вот итоги первого месяца 2026 года🤍 Как у вас дела?
custom 519283179836671721536custom 528097574144025150332custom 531024237873965371123
Представьте ситуацию, вам ставят условия, что книги одного из ваших самых любимых авторов пропадут навсегда, но вы сами можете выбрать этого автора. Кто это будет? Кем вы пожертвуете?💔
custom 531024237873965371119custom 528097574144025150317custom 519283179836671721514
#подборкакниг , которые, на мой взгляд, читали все, но не я🤩 Незакрытый гештальт по этим книгам, но что я пока точно не хочу читать, так это Донну Тартт и ее «Тайную историю» Остальные обязательно в планах! Что-то детское и подростковое, школьное, но интерес к ним огромный🤩
custom 519283179836671721528custom 528097574144025150316custom 531024237873965371110
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @alin_sinchuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“книжная Алины🤍” (@alin_sinchuk), 474 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alin_sinchuk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.