علي هاشم عبر مجلة الفورين بوليسي الأميركية: العالم لا يزال يسأل #إيران السؤال الخطأ⬇️⬇️⬇️

Channel
⚠️Ali Hashem علي هاشم⚠️
@alihashemfeed
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
561subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001893263282 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alihashemfeed |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alihashemfeed |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 561 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 565 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 565 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 14 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
24 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 83.3% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2024 to 19 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔴«يرى علي هاشم أنه لا يمكن نوقع النجاح بفرض شروط على #إيران كانت ترفضها خلال خمسة قرون من تماسكها السياسي، مضيفا في مقال بمجلة "فورين بوليسي" الأميركية أنّ إيران اتواجه اليوم بناءً على مبدأ القدرة على الاستمرار حتى تصبح واشنطن مضطرّةً لإيجاد مخرج»… 🔴السؤال الأكثر فائدة هو: ماذا تريد إيران؟ ليس تلك الحكومة، وليس ذلك القائد الأعلى.. 📌حول الدولة والخمسة قرون من التماسك السياسي يجيب علي هاشم على التساؤل كيف تشكّلت …
❤4
أين نقف الآن؟ كلا الجانبين أوضحا حججهما بشأن الخطوات التالية؛ ترامب يُصرّ على انجاز صفقة دون أي نية لمنح الإيرانيين أي سبب للثقة في العملية. بينما أكد قاليباف أن إيران لن تقبل بالتفاوض تحت الحصار. ماذا بعد؟ يقترب وقف إطلاق النار من نهايته، ما قد يُنذر بجولة أخرى من الحرب، قد تكون أشدّ وطأة، ومع ذلك يُمكن تجنّبها. الفجوة ظاهرية أكثر منها جوهرية، ما يمنح الوسطاء أدواتٍ عديدة لتضييقها، ولكن في وقتٍ محدود للغاية.…
علي هاشم يجيب على التساؤل: أين نحن الآن؟
https://youtu.be/z4E7R0y8Zr8?si=Y7ErwStp4x4Byw92
🔴#طهران وواشنطن: خطر الثقة المفرطة في فهم الآخر ✔️هذه الصورة القاتمة، جعلت من الجملة المفتاحية في مسلسل “صراع العروش”، التي تقول فيها الشخصيات الأساسية: “الشتاء قادم”، عبارة ردّدها جزء من الإيرانيّين. لاحقًا.. علي هاشم يفند ويحلل تقديرات الإيرانيين و «الثقة المفرطة للآخر» وسوء قراءة طهران للمشهد في تسلسل زمني منذ بداية الحرب في أوكرانيا وحتى وقتنا هذا المقالة موثقة بالمصادر على رابط ⬇️ https://aljadah.media/arc…
مقالة جديدة بعنوان “المواجهة الكبرى: مستقبل إيران، مستقبل العالم”. محاولة لفهم ما يجري داخل إيران الآن، لكن من زاوية أبعد من الشارع والاحتجاجات. أتناول فيها جذور اللحظة الحالية، من الشاه إلى الثورة، ومن حرب غزة إلى الصراع على شكل الإقليم. ما يحدث في إيران لن يبقى داخل إيران، وسيحدد توازن المنطقة بأكملها في السنوات المقبلة. https://aljadah.media/archives/85133
❤1
🔴«إيران ليست دولة هرمة. في عمر الدول، لا تزال شابة نسبيا. ومع ذلك، تحولت تدريجيا، ولأسباب مركبة، إلى ما يشبه رجل المنطقة المريض. ليس بسبب الحصار وحده، بل بسبب نمط إدارة يستهلك ما تبقى من عناصر القوة ويزيد الضغط على المواطن..» علي هاشم يكتب ويفند موجة الغضب الجديدة في إيران ويكشف تفاصيل أزمة ومعضلة طهران على رابط⬇️ https://aljadah.media/archives/85083
❤1
🔴لا حاجة للنقاش هنا، ولا سيّما بعد اغتيال المسؤول العسكريّ هيثم #علي_الطباطبائي أنّ الحزب ما زال في أصعب حقبة تمرُّ عليه منذالتأسيس… ✔️المقاومة المثخنة بالجراح والمفاهيم ✔️حرب حقيقية. نعم حقيقية ✔️الردع والترميم… غايات لا وسائل؟ ✔️الحضور الإيراني في مشهد الترميم ✔️المعضلة الأمنيّة ✔️الترهل اللبنانيّ ✔️جرس إنذار للجيش اللبناني كل هذا وأكثر يسرد حوله علي هاشم ومحمد محسن بالتفاصيل والتحليل "مسار التر…
❤2
عن إيران بعد وفاة الاتفاق النووي، مقالتي ل “الجادة” حول مستقبل البرنامج النووي والجدل بين التحذيريين والمندفعين في طهران: الردع الكامن أم الردع الكامل؟ https://aljadah.media/archives/84097
❤2
📢 كيف تغيّر حزب الله؟ هل تراجعت أهدافه الكبرى وأصبح يبحث عن الصمود فقط؟ كيف أثرت الحرب الأخيرة على قدراته؟ وهل أصبح أكثر هشاشة أمنياً؟ كنت ضيفا على #جسر_بودكاست @JeserPodcast مع خير الدين الجابري @Khair_Aljabri حيث خضنا النقاش حول محطات الحزب المفصلية منذ التأسيس وحتى اليوم. 📺 شاهدوا الحلقة عبر يوتيوب: 🔗 https://youtu.be/EYVVfPu2tCs?si=PLYw8vievyPbAIui
❤5
https://t.me/boost/jadehiran
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @alihashemfeed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,421,231 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@alihashemfeed named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚠️Ali Hashem علي هاشم⚠️” (@alihashemfeed), 561 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alihashemfeed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.