Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AliaZen's Art

Channel

AliaZen's Art

@aliazens_art

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

437subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002374505822
TypeChannel
Username@aliazens_art
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aliazens_art

Growth

4334374356 August 2026 — 433 subscribers6 August 2026 — 433 subscribers14 August 2026 — 437 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 432–438 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:15437+4
6 Aug 2026, 19:18433no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:31433first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
99.7%
avg views ÷ 437 subscribers
Avg views / post
436
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total4,792
Reactions total474
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

920 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 534396870392075984323025.0%
custom 547204265300253573818420.0%
custom 520201877206758573216117.5%
custom 597663479412398973513214.3%
custom 5936159207010078575495.33%
custom 5999199311051623573495.33%
custom 5472034952126175600323.48%
💯272.93%
custom 5474462235713640524181.96%
custom 5472062392672230006101.09%
custom 593134670903981533560.652%
60.652%
custom 522923946733577204050.543%
custom 546968643394394840240.435%
custom 533728082136559519830.326%
custom 544313731694203149220.217%
custom 537285253508000078210.109%
👀10.109%

Custom emoji. 15 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 920reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC65 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

Наконец-то выгрузили эту песню, очень ждала!!🤪 Я люблю многие саундреки ПЖ, но эта мелодия попала в самое сердце с первой ноты - до мурашек 😭 #музыка@aliazens_art

6custom 52292394673357720405custom 59313467090398153355custom 53372808213655951983

3 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC≈2,050 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Леон в этой обнове ПЖ чисто: #последняяжертва #мемы

custom 547446223571364052418custom 59991993110516235736custom 54696864339439484024💯2custom 54431373169420314922custom 53728525350800007821custom 59313467090398153351

29 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC287 views59 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо за участие в опросе 🙏 Эта тема мучит меня уже несколько месяцев и я никак не решаюсь завести разговор. Но потом решила, что будет правильно и честно объясниться. О Дециане: Наверное уже все заметили, что я перестала его рисовать. И на это есть причины, которые возникли не в один день, а тянутся уже очень давно. Так вышло, что сейчас я отпустила свой фикс по нему в мирное русло. Я по-прежнему люблю героя и п

custom 593615920701007857524custom 520201877206758573218custom 597663479412398973512💯3custom 59991993110516235732

28 Jul 2026, 20:41 UTC293 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Чувствуете ли вы обиду, что я перестала рисовать Дециана?

  1. ДА. Но я принимаю это🙏12%
  2. ДА. И я не могу с этим смириться 😡13%
  3. НЕТ. Ты вправе рисовать всё, что хочешь 🥺65%
  4. НЕТ. Мне кристально все-равно 🙄4%
  5. Кто такой этот ваш Дециан? 🤨6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Jul 2026, 17:14 UTC284 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Самый быстрый арт за последнее время (всего ~3 часа работы), а итог мне нравится больше, чем во многих других полноценках. Поделюсь новостями. Знаю, что кормила вас випками последнее время, но сейчас моё творчество немного встало: в одной работе я размахнулась на такой масштаб, что очень устала, ничего не получается как надо, и это сильно расстраивает. Поэтому такая "мини-передышка" отлично разбавила тревоги и приба

custom 597663479412398973513custom 520201877206758573212custom 593615920701007857510custom 54720426530025357383custom 59991993110516235732

27 Jul 2026, 22:36 UTC250 views54 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 520201877206758573219custom 547204265300253573815custom 534396870392075984312custom 59766347941239897354custom 54720623926722300062custom 59991993110516235732

27 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC270 views93 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Не моя ветка, но обожаю всем сердцем этого бродячего кота 😽 #sevenheartsstories #смертельныйбиом #мор #робин #арт

custom 534396870392075984334custom 547204265300253573832custom 520201877206758573222custom 59991993110516235735

20 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC353 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Легион уже познал эту жизнь: в очках и шлепках 😂😂😂 Я тут ору на весь дом новому образу, какой же шикарный 🤪🤪 солью всё, но выбью!!!

custom 547204265300253573820custom 53439687039207598439custom 52020187720675857326custom 59991993110516235732

20 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTC355 views81 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Ладно, сначала было стыдно вам показывать, а потом думаю, че не показать: и пофиг, что криво, зато как мило 🥹 Открыла очередную квалификацию в творчестве и сделала вот такой забавный обвесик (получилось довольно кривовато – сошлюсь на первую попытку, но сам опыт был весьма интересным и хорошо разбавил рутину). Висит у меня теперь на телефоне, люблю всем сердцем 🥰 надо кого-нибудь ещё поделать, авось, и руку набью.

custom 520201877206758573235custom 547204265300253573823custom 593615920701007857513custom 53439687039207598434custom 59766347941239897353custom 59991993110516235733

18 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC298 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Она тупо начинает и ничего не заканчивает 🧃

custom 547203495212617560013custom 520201877206758573210custom 59766347941239897356

18 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC287 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 534396870392075984312custom 54720426530025357388custom 54720623926722300068

15 Jul 2026, 00:05 UTC395 views69 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В этот день, ровно год назад опубликовала свой самый первый арт с Децианом... И хотя после него и нарисовала ещё уйму других, но я по-прежнему очень сильно люблю его за те сильнейшие чувства, что способствовали его созданию, и что рождаются во мне до сих пор, сколько бы времени ни прошло 😢

custom 534396870392075984330custom 597663479412398973520custom 520201877206758573216custom 59361592070100785752custom 59991993110516235731

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aliazens_art. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 20:41 UTCFinal Results100 voters

Чувствуете ли вы обиду, что я перестала рисовать Дециана?

  1. ДА. Но я принимаю это🙏12%
  2. ДА. И я не могу с этим смириться 😡13%
  3. НЕТ. Ты вправе рисовать всё, что хочешь 🥺65%
  4. НЕТ. Мне кристально все-равно 🙄4%
  5. Кто такой этот ваш Дециан? 🤨6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 314,589 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AliaZen's Art” (@aliazens_art), 437 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aliazens_art.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.