3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35–46 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 20:04
45
+9
10 Aug 2026, 22:47
36
no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:47
36
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 29 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
232.2%
avg views ÷ 45 subscribers
Avg views / post
105
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
8 (29 October 2023 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
627
Reactions total
16
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
19
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2023 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
وعن ابن مسْعُودٍ رضي اللَّه عنه: أن رسول الله ﷺ قال :
«إن أولى الناس بي يوم القيامة أكثرهم علي صلاة».
İbn Mes’ûd’dan -radiyallâhu anh- rivayet edildiğine göre: Rasûlullâh -sallallâhu aleyhi ve sellem- şöyle buyurmuştur:
“Kıyâmet gününde insanların bana en yakın olanları, bana en çok salâvat getirenleridir.”
İbn Ebî Şeybe, el-Musned (306)
قال أبو حاتم البستي:
في هذا الخبر دليل على أن أولى الناس برسول الله -ﷺ- في…
قال الحسن بن الحسين البغدادي:
حدثنا أحمد، حدثنا عبد الله، حدثني أبي حدثني محمد بن عبد الله، حدثنا سفيان، عن عمر بن عبد العزيز، قال:
«من عمل بغير علم كان ما يفسد أكثر مما يصلح».
el-Hasen bin el-Hüseyn el-Bağdâdî dedi ki:
Bize Ahmed (bin Süleyman en-Neccâd) tahdîs etti: Bize Abdullâh (bin Ahmed) tahdîs etti: Bana Babam tahdîs etti: Bana Muammed bin Abdullâh tahdîs etti: Bize Sufyân tahdîs etti: O da Ömer bin Abdüla…
قال عبد الله بن أحمد:
حدثنا أبي، قال ثنا علي، قال أخبرنا عبد الله، قال أبنا وهيب أو غيره، عن عمر بن عبد العزيز رضي الله عنه قال:
«من عدَّ كلامَه من عمله، قل كلامه».
Abdullah bin Ahmed dedi ki:
Bize Babam tahdîs edip dedi ki: Bize Ali tahdîs edip dedi ki: Bize Abdullâh haber verip dedi ki: Bize Vuheyb veya başkası bildirdi: O da Ömer bin Abdulazîz’den -radiyallâhu anh- dedi ki:
“Kim sözlerini amelinden sayarsa, o…
قال الحافظ إبن أبي الحافظ الرازي:
حدثنا علي بن الحسين، ثنا أبو طاهر، أخبرنا ابن وهب، قال: قال مالك:
«العلم: الحكمة، ونور يهدي الله به من يشاء، وليس بكثرة المسائل».
el-Hâfız İbn Ebî’l-Hâfız er-Râzî dedi ki:
Bize Ali bin el-Hüseyn tahdîs etti: Bize Ebû Tahir tahdîs etti: Bize İbn Vehb haber verip dedi ki:
Mâlik dedi ki:
“İlîm, hikmet ve Allâh’ın kendisi ile dilediğini hidâyete iletiği bir nûr’dur. Mesâilerin/Mese…
قال محمد بن مخلد:
حدثنا أحمد، ثنا حرملة، ثنا ابن وهب قال: سمعت مالكا يقول:
«إن حقا على من طلب أن يكون له متبعا لأثر من مضى قبله»
Muhammed bin Mahled dedi ki:
Bize Ahmed tahdîs etti: Bize Harmele tahdîs etti: Bize İbn Vehb tahdîs edip dedi ki:
Mâlik’i şöyle derken işittim:
“İlîm taleb eden kimsenin kendisinden önce geçenlerin/gelenlerin eserlerine tabi olması onun üzerine bir haktır.”
Mâ Revâhu’l-Ekâbir 'An Mâl…
قال أبو بكر الآجري:
وحدثنا الفريابي قال: ثنا العباس بن الوليد بن مزيد قال: أخبرني أبي قال: سمعت الأوزاعي يقول:
«عليك بآثار من سلف، وإن رفضك الناس، وإياك وآراء الرجال، وإن زخرفوا لك بالقول».
Ebû Bekr el-Âcurrî dedi ki:
Bize el-Firyâbî tahdîs edip dedi ki: Bize el-Abbas bin el-Velid bin Mezyed tahdîs edip dedi ki: Bana Babam haber verip dedi ki:
el-Evzâî’yi şöyle derken işittim:
“İnsânlar seni reddetse/terketse …
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @alhanbali21. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 210,133 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كُنَّاشَةُ أَبِي سُلَيْمٍ الحَنْبَلِيّ” (@alhanbali21), 45 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alhanbali21.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.