We will soon resume posting results to the channel. Stay tuned and patient
👍6❤2

Channel
@algotestinglab
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
974subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002109661076 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @algotestinglab |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/algotestinglab |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 974 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 971 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 975 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 976 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 973 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 973 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 17 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
14 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9 | 64.3% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 21.4% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2025 to 3 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
We will soon resume posting results to the channel. Stay tuned and patient
👍6❤2
Mm flipcode also blew up after making incredible results on the account. My advice is not to use the EA on a low account like 100, 1k but rather use something like 10K account and then reduced lot.. This will give the EA enough margin to pay with. If you don't have such high amount, just use a cent account and a 10k account will just be like $100
GBPUSD Robot blew up after it made a 28x on the account, thats about 2866% on the account. By that time, most would have taken profits before this crash
👍3
+30% Profit made from portfolios Pro EA with %0.03 DD for now
+12.86% Made from Currency Pros Gold which is almost $129 profits
+39.94% Made so far from Forex Obsidian which is about $16,000
❤1🤯1
+44.67% Made so far from Gemini AI smart Which is about $17,000
$23 made this week from IS VIP four. Monday to Tuesday Check out the EA from here ⬇️ https://sptradingshop.com/product/is-vip-four-ea/
+158.96% made so far from IS VIP Four
+301% Made so far with MMFlip Code
$506 made this week from MM FlipCode Pro Check out the EA from here ⬇️ https://sptradingshop.com/product/mm-flip-codepro-mt4/
🔥1
$40 profit made from AI trading robot from Monday to Tuesday Check the EA out ⬇️ https://sptradingshop.com/product/ai-trading-bot-mt4/
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @algotestinglab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SP Algo Testing Lab” (@algotestinglab), 974 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/algotestinglab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.