Кстати, у нас есть отличный повод встретиться и познакомиться на собрании по избранию делегатов на конференцию адвокатов Краснодарского края: 10 февраля 2025г. в 11:00 в помещении Адвокатской палаты по адресу: г.Краснодар, ул. Кубанская Набережная 31/1.

Channel
Правовые алгоритмы
@algopravo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
906subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001153218212 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @algopravo |
| Description | Канал о навыках судебного представительства и повседневной юриспруденции от практикующего адвоката. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/algopravo |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 906 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 906 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 20 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 130
- Videos
- 14
- Links
- 241
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 17s
- Average length
- 2m 17s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
288 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 113 | 39.2% | |
| 😁 | 59 | 20.5% | |
| 💯 | 41 | 14.2% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 5.90% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 5.56% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 2.43% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 2.08% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 1.04% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.04% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 1.04% | |
| 🙊 | 3 | 1.04% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.04% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 1.04% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.694% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.694% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.694% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.347% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.347% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.347% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.347% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.347% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 288reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2025 to 21 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 60
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 7
- of 19 we hold a reading for · 37%
- Most on one post
- 16
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @algopravo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 February 2025 to 21 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 5.26%
- 1 of 19 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 782
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 679
- over 18 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VfnxxSCA96 | 1 | 22 February 2025 | 22 February 2025 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2025 to 21 January 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
👋 Здравствуйте, коллеги. Рад представить вам первую в России супер-группу телеграм адвокатских кабинетов и малых адвокатских образований. Группа решает главные проблемы адвокатов "одиночек": - разрозненность - профессиональная изоляция - отсутствие представительства Основная цель группы - консолидация адвокатов: - обмен опытом и взаимопомощь - профессиональные контакты - база знаний о деятельности адвокатских ка…
❤5
••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 💡Правовые алгоритмы
💯17👍7😁5
Ну, теперь-то точно заживём! Вот он какой, Золотой век российской адвокатуры! ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 💡Правовые алгоритмы
😁17👍5🔥4🤣2🏆1🤩1
Соскучились или ну его нафиг? ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 💡Правовые алгоритмы
👍29😁8🔥3❤🔥1
••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 💡Правовые алгоритмы
💯8😁8❤2🔥2🤔1
Первый раз столкнулся с таким. Обычно ведь как: в определении указывается дата и время предварительного заседания, а потом идёт фраза о том, что если дело будет признано судом подготовленным, то вслед за предварительным сразу будет проведено и основное. Но не в этот раз. Именно отсутствие указания на основное заседание меня и смутило. Поэтому я дочитал всё до конца, хотя, должен признаться, мне это не свойственно. …
👍5
На самом деле, этот мем - некоторое преувеличение. Помню, я не мог отказать судьям в просьбе подготовить проект решения: сразу давал положительный ответ и не брал за эту работу денег с доверителей. Несколько раз сталкивался с тем, что после такой помощи судье и помощнику они со своей стороны игнорировали мои просьбы организационного характера или вовсе отказывались от вполне рабочих контактов и отправляли в канцеляр…
👍17💯11❤🔥2❤1🐳1
Постановление КС РФ от 28.01.2025 г. № 3-П Предмет проверки - ст.ст. 12, 304 ГК РФ и ч. 5 ст. 1 ФЗ "О государственной регистрации недвижимости". Решение КС РФ: Статьи 12 и 304 ГК РФ и ч. 5 ст. 1 ФЗ "О государственной регистрации недвижимости" не противречат Конституции РФ в той мере, в какой по своему конституционно-правовому смыслу в системе действующего правового регулирования - применительно к заявленному в защи…
👏5❤2🔥2
На днях стал свидетелем разговора, в котором обсуждалось внесение изменений в банковскую гарантию. Этот разговор вообще прошёл мимо меня, если бы не фраза "пункт номер ноль"... Смысл в следующем. Есть банковская гарантия. Документ начинается словами "независимая гарантия", под которыми как бы в виде таблицы указан ряд условий, в том числе условие о сроке действия гарантии. После таблицы идут условия гарантии под пун…
👍5❤3
Представьте себе следующую ситуацию. Ваш доверитель подал иск, который судом обездвижен до, например, 1 февраля. Об этом Ваш доверитель неожиданно вспомнил через месяц после окончания установленного судом срока и обратился с резонным вопросом - что делать? И да, иск естественно подан в последний день истечения срока исковой давности... Всё, как мы любим! В такой ситуации вариант один - подать заявление об исправлени…
👍10🎉6❤2👏2🔥1
Это могло быть протокольное фото людей самых разных профессий. Однако последнее профессиональное сословие, которое бы пришло на ум в этом контексте - судейское. Так я написал бы несколько лет назад, но точно не сейчас. Для дня сегодняшнего всё правильно и органично. Вообще нет претензий. В тоже время есть и другие. Например, судья Конституционного Суда России в отставке - Тамара Морщакова. В незаблокированном, но з…
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @algopravo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Правовые алгоритмы” (@algopravo), 906 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/algopravo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.