Channel
@algofox
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
266subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001535544209 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @algofox |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/algofox |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 266 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 265 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 265 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
18 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8 | 44.4% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 27.8% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 16.7% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сверяете ли вы результаты торговли ботов с бэктестом на том же периоде?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что с диверсификацией.. Если объединить несколько стратегий в портфель, создает ли это дополнительное математическое ожидание? Если под математическим ожиданием понимать именно Expected Value, то сам факт диверсификации нового математического ожидания не создает. Портфель получает свое ожидание из ожиданий входящих в него стратегий. При этом диверсификация может существенно влиять на другие характеристики: * с…
👍3
После недавних обсуждений решил немного разобраться с термином "математическое ожидание" и его связью с диверсификацией. Если говорить строго, то математическое ожидание (Expected Value, EV) - это средний ожидаемый результат случайной величины. Для торговой системы его часто рассматривают как средний результат сделки с учетом вероятностей выигрышей и проигрышей. Проще говоря, это ответ на вопрос: "Сколько в средн…
👍1
На каком базовом таймфрейме (+/-) в основном работают ваши торговые роботы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
В поиске новых идей решил разобраться, в каких направлениях вообще можно проводить исследования в алготрейдинге. Если подняться выше уровня конкретных стратегий, то большинство алгоритмов пытаются монетизировать всего несколько фундаментальных рыночных эффектов. 1. Инерция * Trend Following - продолжение движения цены * Momentum - сохранение силы движения * Breakout - выход из диапазона 2. Возврат *…
👍2
Что в трейдинге вы называете математическим ожиданием?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Создает ли диверсификация торговых стратегий дополнительное математическое ожидание?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как, по вашему мнению, ИИ повлиял на возможность зарабатывать в алготрейдинге?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Posted without readable text
Как ИИ встроен в ваш процесс разработки?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какую максимальную задержку исполнения (latency) допускают ваши торговые стратегии?
Shares as published, totalling 98%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Допускаете ли вы влияние сверхъестественных сил на биржевую торговлю?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥5😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @algofox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сверяете ли вы результаты торговли ботов с бэктестом на том же периоде?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
На каком базовом таймфрейме (+/-) в основном работают ваши торговые роботы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что в трейдинге вы называете математическим ожиданием?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Создает ли диверсификация торговых стратегий дополнительное математическое ожидание?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как, по вашему мнению, ИИ повлиял на возможность зарабатывать в алготрейдинге?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как ИИ встроен в ваш процесс разработки?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 3 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AlgoFox - Алготрейдинг” (@algofox), 266 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/algofox.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.