4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,096–7,122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 01:03
7,119
+13
10 Aug 2026, 07:48
7,106
+7
7 Aug 2026, 09:44
7,099
no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:48
7,099
first reading
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.80%
avg views ÷ 7,119 subscribers
Avg views / post
484
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
40 (1 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
19,370
Reactions total
310
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 02:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 16s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
310 reactions across 40 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
183
59.0%
🕊
29
9.35%
👍
23
7.42%
💔
14
4.52%
💘
12
3.87%
🍓
10
3.23%
😢
8
2.58%
👏
7
2.26%
👌
6
1.94%
💯
5
1.61%
😁
5
1.61%
🔥
3
0.968%
🥰
2
0.645%
😇
1
0.323%
😍
1
0.323%
🫡
1
0.323%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 310reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تأتي النعمة فتُدني الأقدار من يدك فرع الثمر الحلو وأنت لا ترى جذره ولا تملكه ، ثم تتحول فإذا يدك على فرع الثمر المر وأنت كذلك لا ترى ولا تملك . ألا فأعلم أن الإيمان هو الثقة بأن الفرعين كليهما يصلانك بالله ، فالحلو فرع عبادته بالحمد والشكر ، وهو الأحلى عندك حين تذوقه بالحس ، والمر عبادته بالصبر والرضا ، وهو الأحلى حين تذوقه بالروح
الرافعي 🧉🫖
لا ينقصنا من اللغة شيء وهي على ما هي من إحكام الأوضاع والتراكيب والاتساع للمفردات ولو أقبلت كأعناق السيل، ولكن ينقص هذه اللغة رجال يعملون ويحسنون إذا عملوا، ويعرفون كيف يتأتى عملهم إلى الإحسان، وكيف يكون عملهم عملًا.
تحت راية القرآن للرافعي 🧉
"كنت أحمل بين جوانحي لأعدائي ضغنًا وحقدًا، فأصبحت لا أشعر بما كنت أشعر به من قبل؛ لأن الحب ملك عليَّ قلبي واستخلصه لنفسه، فلم يترك فيه مجالًا لشيءٍ سواه."
النظرات 🧉
بيتين من الشعر بصوتي المتواضع
من جميل ما يُروى في لغة العيون:
«وإذا التقينا والعيونُ روامقٌ
صمتَ اللسانُ وطرفُها يتكلَّمُ
تشكو فأفهمُ ما تقولُ بطرفِها
ويردُّ طرفي مثلَ ذاكَ فتفهمُ»
تُنسب إلى بشّار بن بُرد.
واللافت أن بشّارًا كان ضريرًا، ومع ذلك نُسبت إليه هذه الأبيات التي جعل فيها للعيون لغةً، وللنظرات حديثًا يفوق الكلام.
ولعل أجمل ما فيها أن بعض المشاعر لا تحتاج إلى صوتٍ كي تُقال، ولا إلى لسانٍ كي تُفهم.
#الوفاء
رسالة الى السيد مصطفى لطفي المنفلوطي
يا صاحب النظرات
تزوجت منذ سنةٍ من زوجةٍ صالحةٍ، طيبة القلب والسريرة، فاغتبطت بعشرتها برهةً من الزمان، وفي هذه الأيام عرض لها رمدٌ في عينيها فذهب ببصرها فأصبحت عمياء، وأصبحت أعمى بجانبها، قد بدا لي أن أطلقها، وأتزوَّج من غيرها، فماذا تَرى؟
إنسان 📬
رد السيد مصطفى لطفي المنفلوطي ✉️
أيها الإنسان لا تفعل، فإنك إن فعلت كان عليك إثم الخائنين، وجرم الغادرين. كن اليوم أحرص على…
إن الفقير يعيش في دنياه في أرض شائكة قد ألفها وعتادها، فهو لا يتألم لوخزاتها ولذعاتها، ولكن إذا وجد يوما من الأيام بين هذه الأشواك وردة نضرة طار فرحا وسرورا وأن الغني يعيش منها في روضة مملوءة بالورود والأزهار قد سئمها وبرمها، فهو لا يشعر بجمالها ولا يتذذ بطيب رائحتها، ولكن عثر في بشوكة تؤلمها ألما شديدا لا يشعر مثله سواه، وخير واحد أن يعيش فقيرا مؤملا كل شيء، من أن يعيش غنيا يتقدمها من كل شيء
المنفلوطي 🧉
مقالة الإغراق للمنفلوطي رحمه الله
من كتاب النظرات
الإغراق
بين الإغراق في المدح والإغراق في الذم تموت الحقيقة موتًا لا حياة لها من بعده إلى يوم يبعثون.
يسمع السامع أنَّ زيدًا ملكٌ كريم، ثم يسمع أنه شيطان رجيم، فيخرج منه صِفْرَ اليدين، لا يعلم أين مكانه من هذين الطرفين.
يقولون: «إنَّ المشعوذين إذا أرادوا أن يسحروا أعين الناس وضعوا في سقف غرفةٍ قطعةً من المغناطيس، وفي أرضها قطعة أخرى، ثم يتركون في الفضاء قطعةً من الح…
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @alferu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 732,889 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أدب الرافعي و المنفلوطي وشاكر” (@alferu), 7,119 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alferu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.