2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 180–182 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 12:00
181
no change
9 Aug 2026, 11:48
181
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
72.4%
avg views ÷ 181 subscribers
Avg views / post
131
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
13 (24 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,572
Reactions total
174
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
329
Videos
54
Links
8
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
174 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
34
19.5%
❤🔥
33
19.0%
👍
33
19.0%
❤
30
17.2%
🤣
10
5.75%
🤯
10
5.75%
👻
8
4.60%
🤩
8
4.60%
😍
7
4.02%
😈
1
0.575%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👁 Если вам страшно от моих фотографий — представьте, каково мне жить у себя в голове.
Парадокс: я снимаю хоррор, но почти не смотрю фильмы ужасов. И да — мне действительно страшно.
🧠 У меня слишком яркое воображение, и для вдохновения мне достаточно собственных образов, постоянно всплывающих в голове.
В хоррор фильмах меня больше всего цепляют отдельные кадры и их атмосфера.
Я мыслю образами: светом, цветом, сюже…
🎬 В готовом результате всё выглядит так, будто именно это и происходило на локации. Но на бэкстейдже хорошо видно, с чего начинались эти кадры.
Я использую обработку и нейросети не для того, чтобы заменить реальный квест выдуманной картинкой.
✨ Для меня это инструменты, которые помогают усилить атмосферу, довести образ и реализовать художественный замысел.
Но здесь особенно важен баланс.
📸 Фотография должна впеча…
⛪️ Два кадра. Одна задача — сделать так, чтобы Квест «Проклятие монахини» невозможно было спутать с десятками других проектов похожей тематики.
Образ монахини, одержимость, свечи, мистика — всё это уже много раз появлялось в рекламе хоррор-квестов.
🎭 Поэтому мне нужно было не просто красиво снять знакомую тему, а найти для проекта собственное визуальное лицо.
И я считаю, что с этой задачей справился.
👁 Теперь у к…
🔥 20 отснятых проектов за один месяц. Челлендж, который я себе устроил.
Июль стал для меня не просто насыщенным месяцем.
20 проектов за один месяц — это постоянное переключение между разными мирами.
🩸 Хоррор
⚡️ Экшен
🕯 Мистика
🔪 Маньяки и слэшеры
🧠 Психологический хоррор
И главный вызов был не просто в том, чтобы выдержать такой темп.
А в том, чтобы каждый раз заново погружаться в новый мир, находить его характе…
Перед съёмкой меня часто можно увидеть сидящим с закрытыми глазами.
Нет, я не сплю — я «смотрю свои мультики». 😊🎬
Это моя особенность и часть моего подхода: сначала я создаю сцену внутри головы. Придумываю сюжет, запускаю действие и мысленно летаю камерой по локации, рассматривая будущий кадр с разных сторон.
Я начинаю снимать только тогда, когда полностью представляю финальный результат.
Остаётся открыть глаза и…
🎬 Квесты:
🪚 «Техасская резня бензопилой» (Мск)
🎪 «Не тот цирк» (Мск)
🧪 «Проект Illness» (Мск)
⠀
Я не таскаю удачные приёмы из проекта в проект. Так разные квесты превращаются в одну и ту же съёмку.
⠀
🎭 У каждого жанра свой визуальный язык. Поэтому на новой площадке я полностью меняю способ мышления.
⠀
🎯 Мой стиль — быть разным и точно попадать в нерв конкретного проекта.
На днях мы провели большую фотосессию сразу на пяти наших проектах вместе с замечательным Алексеем Тверяковым 📷
Готовые фотографии покажем совсем скоро. А пока пишите в комментариях, кадры с какого квеста показать первыми?
🎪 Квест: «Не тот цирк» (Мск)
⠀
📸 Одна локация. Три съёмки. Десять лет роста.
⠀
1️⃣ 2026 год
2️⃣ 2024 год
3️⃣ 2016 год
⠀
📈 Эти фотографии позволяют увидеть мой профессиональный путь почти в чистом виде: пространство практически не изменилось — изменился человек, который смотрит на него уже в третий раз.
⠀
С годами в моей работе появилось больше точности: в том, как раскрыть характер персонажа через взгляд и пластику, …
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @alextveryakov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 611,870 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алексей Тверяков | Квест-фотограф” (@alextveryakov), 181 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alextveryakov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
