2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79–81 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 19:16
80
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:54
80
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 19 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
85.0%
avg views ÷ 80 subscribers
Avg views / post
68.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
14.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held
18 (19 March 2026 – 21 July 2026)
Views total
68
Reactions total
10
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
7
Videos
8
Links
5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
49s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
175 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
97
55.4%
custom 5287537811518399157
28
16.0%
🍌
18
10.3%
custom 5219943216781995020
16
9.14%
custom 5409008750893734809
10
5.71%
custom 5407021800238359670
6
3.43%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alexeyponarin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 March 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Давно не выходил на связь, чуть подзабил на медийку, немного другие приоритеты пока.
Но сегодня захотелось поделиться некоторыми мыслями.
Совсем недавно жизнь подкинула мне несколько ситуаций (конечно же, расставив их в нужном порядке), в которых пришлось разрешить конфликт внутренних ценностей. Тот самый случай, когда в центре внимания становится даже не отношение окружающих людей к тебе и не какие-либо последствия…
Каждый день, когда ты откладываешь своё дело на потом, ты в очередной раз отодвигаешь свою мечту.
То, где ты будешь через 3, 5 или 10 лет, определяется тем, когда ты начнёшь.
Вообще среда играет огромную роль. Наши действия, отношение к ним и состояние, в котором мы их выполняем, чаще всего определяются привычными моделями поведения в конкретной ситуации. В большинстве случаев состояние — это просто привычная реакция на тот или иной триггер.
Условия, люди, обстановка — ко всему этому мы привыкаем реагировать определённым образом, формируя в голове устойчивые цепочки. А затем именно эти ц…
Возвращаясь из Краснодара в Москву, я всегда нахожусь в слишком расслабленном состоянии, словно остаюсь в режиме отдыха.
Но по приезде уже автоматически меняется режим и включается дисциплина и концентрация. Возвращение словно выбрасывает из зоны комфорта, заставляет снова двигаться, принимать решения, возвращает фокус.
Для этого очень важно создавать нужные условия и среду там, где живёшь и работаешь большую част…
⚪️ Тепло приветствую каждого, кто только что оказался здесь!
Расскажу немного о себе.
Я тот, кто решил действовать. Тот, кто решил наконец создавать свою реальность, а не ждать, надеяться и бесцельно мечтать.
Сейчас я учусь в одном из лучших университетов страны, занимаюсь любимым делом — стендапом — и развиваю свою социальную сеть для объединения и общения людей. Кроме того регулярно тренируюсь, постоянно перераба…
Когда начинаешь работать на свою цель и вкладываться в себя, многие люди, привычки, досуг уходят сами собой — однозначно к лучшему. Я бы даже сказал: приятный бонус. Хотя часто кажется, что теряешь, упускаешь что-то, на самом же деле — освобождаешься.
Жизнь расчищаешь от хлама.
Действительно важное не отваливается. Оно остаётся с вами и трансформируется согласно текущему движению.
Развитие социальных сетей, оказалось, - тоже дело дисциплины. Для меня, как для человека, который за последний год на принцип исключил по максимуму сети из жизни, довольно непросто ввести в привычку постоянно публиковать что-то, рассказывать о своей жизни людям.
Более того, фокус за последнее время сместился на много других вещей, а по итогу замылился. Конечно, меня это не удовлетворяет, поэтому направляю внимание в…
Правда думаешь, что с тобой что-то не так?
Многие люди воспринимают свои особенности как дефект. Как что-то, что нужно скрыть, исправить или «нормализовать». Страх осуждения и инстинктивный страх быть отвергнутым становятся блоком, который не позволяет проявлять свои уникальные качества. Человек подгоняет себя под шаблон, старается соответствовать «норме» и живёт по примеру окружающего большинства.
Я с детства чувс…
Как изменить жизнь?
Почему люди годами, а то и всю жизнь, не могут отказаться от вредного говна, делают одно и то же по кругу, притерпевая лишь неудачи в жалких попытках вот-вот начать новую жизнь ?
Советы и распространённые способы не работают, лишь загоняют в клетку соблазнов. И это неудивительно, в таких вопросах нужен системный и грамотный подход.
1. Вводить в жизнь полезную привычку или отказываться от вредн…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @alexeyponarin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Абстракция плюс свобода” (@alexeyponarin), 80 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alexeyponarin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
