Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Alexeich | Affiliate Marketing

Channel

Alexeich | Affiliate Marketing

@alexeyalexeich

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,818subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001321423439
TypeChannel
Username@alexeyalexeich
Created24 April 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alexeyalexeich

Growth

2,8092,8232,8166 August 2026 — 2,811 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,811 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,809 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,812 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,823 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,818 subscribers2,8186 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,807–2,825 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 14:542,818-5
12 Aug 2026, 19:032,823+11
9 Aug 2026, 17:032,812+3
6 Aug 2026, 17:372,809-2
6 Aug 2026, 05:072,811no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:322,811first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.1%
avg views ÷ 2,818 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held18 (22 September 202529 July 2026)
Views total2,540
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 7 August 2026

Теорія менеджмента радить дати співробітнику цілі, повноваження та почекати, поки він або досягне цілі, або ні. І після цього приймати рішення щодо подальшої співпраці. Однак, якщо вже видно, що людина вилкою в рот не попадає, як казала моя бабця, не проходить прості тести на дурака або людині треба писати інструкції рівня "не срати на ковьор" шоб він не срав - такому не треба ні цілі, ні повноваження і чекати нічо

Signed Oleksii Sho | Alexeich

23 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нагадую про Poshuk Meetup: Search & AI, який ми (холдингова компанія Swift Punk) робимо у партнерстві з SEO Baza (@Fajela, привіт!). Це буде community sharing, поспати під слайди не вийде. В програмі дві дискусії по півтори години: 🟢 Видимість в AI-пошуку: що реально працює 🟢 Кадри: де брати сеньйорів Буде 6 класних спікерів, я буду модерувати. А ви будьте готові шукати на карті вцілілі склади Вайлдберіз питати, с

Signed Oleksii Sho | Alexeich

2 Jul 2026, 06:39 UTC≈1,670 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Хоч SEO і вмерло (чи вмирає останні 10 років - я хз), це не привід не проводити мітапи. Тому ми з шановною пані Олесею Коробкою @SEOBAZA вирішили провести Poshuk Meetup: Search & AI - оффлайн SEO-мітап в Києві. Формат - community sharing. Це означає, що наші спікери трохи поговорять на задані теми, а далі - спільне із залом обговорення цих тем та Q&A-сесія. Детальний анонс спікерів та тем - трохи згодом. А поки що

Signed Oleksii Sho | Alexeich

3 Jun 2026, 14:19 UTC≈1,880 viewsread 7 August 2026

Як пройшов 🦆 Duck Dinner #3 Десь під кінець літа, думаю, зберемось знов. https://alexeich.com/events/duckdinner3/

Signed Oleksii Sho | Alexeich

27 May 2026, 15:40 UTC≈2,540 viewsread 7 August 2026

Шукаю Operations Manager до СЕО. Тобто до себе. Якщо коротко - людину, яка буде робити частину того, що я роблю зараз, але без мене. Контроль задач, координація керівників, разові доручення, де є ціль, але немає інструкції. Є нюанс: я не згладжую кути. Якщо це для тебе стрес, а не робочий формат - краще не треба. Якщо ок - welcome. Що важливо: • Вмієш працювати з розмитими задачами • Не чекаєш дозволу, щоб почати

Signed Oleksii Sho | Alexeich

26 May 2026, 09:16 UTC≈1,900 viewsread 7 August 2026

Вже 30 травня збираємось на DuckDinner #3. SEO-шнікі, тімліди, affiliate-люди, лайтовий нетворкінг та бідкання про Google. Місця ще є. Нагадую базу: • без сцени і “продаючих” доповідей • без діджея, який хуярить так, шо ти не чуєш співрозмовника • з нормальною їжею, напоями і людьми з індустрії 🗓 30 травня, 16:00–21:00 🍁 Київ 🪙 100 USDT 🫡 50 людей Профіт від івенту - на збір «Повернись живим». Бо донати - то завж

Signed Oleksii Sho | Alexeich

21 May 2026, 11:12 UTC≈5,470 viewsread 7 August 2026

Ревшара - пенсія афіліата. До першого обшуку в офісі ПП. 😏

Signed Oleksii Sho | Alexeich

18 May 2026, 08:10 UTC≈3,510 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ІВЕНТ!!!111 Короче я чутчут пизданув що наш івент буде в березні, він буде в останній день травня, але всім ваще до звєзди в принципі, так шо. Но признаю, віноват, 5 год тюрми. ІВЕНТ!!!!11 Збираємося на Duck Dinner №3. Поїмо, поп'ємо, побалакаєм, трошки похуєсосим гугл та піздаболів. Все як завжди, чо :) Наші івенти ми робим на трьох простих правилах: 1️⃣ Достатньо напоів та їжі, бо негоже манімейкєрам в булошну

Signed Oleksii Sho | Alexeich

15 May 2026, 08:34 UTC≈2,040 viewsread 7 August 2026

Ідея №326: запитувати на співбесіді чи вірить кандидат у астрологію і що не можна сміття виносити ввечері. Логіка: гарний сеошник має мати аналітичний склад розуму. Віра в таро і Меркурій в третьому домі - це маркер магічного мислення, що погано корелює з наявністю аналітичного. Значить такого краще не брать. Хоча міг би й сам здогадатись, таро б підказали 🃏

Signed Oleksii Sho | Alexeich

27 Apr 2026, 12:55 UTC≈2,790 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Чи є серед шановного товариства потужний біздев/аффменеджер, що вміє грамотно продавати трафік з досвідом роботи в афф. командах, який може не просто піздєть на вумних щщах, а реально працювати руцями? Шукаємо собі в новий юніт розумну роботящу людину, ЗП и умови - ваші. За успішну рекомендацію - 1 оклад після ВТ. @alexxxeich

Signed Oleksii Sho | Alexeich

5 Dec 2025, 08:45 UTC≈4,150 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Працюєш по UA?

  1. Так11%
  2. Ні49%
  3. Глянути відповідь41%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Dec 2025, 08:44 UTC≈3,850 viewsread 7 August 2026

Цікаво. Хто працює на iGaming ринку України зараз як афф? Або не працює. Яка статистика? Ми для себе вирішили, що під час війни не хочемо. Не алльо. Нікого з колег при цьому, звісно, не засуджуючи. І трохи був здивований (бо постійно бачу в чатіку обговорення уа ринку) коли побачив ту ж саму позицію у колеги, з яким спілкувались на DuckDinner'і. То ж, цитуючи Вітю Розового (без інших його приколів, лол): шо ви,

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @alexeyalexeich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Dec 2025, 08:45 UTCAnonymous Poll648 voters

Працюєш по UA?

  1. Так11%
  2. Ні49%
  3. Глянути відповідь41%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2025 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 116,913 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alexeich | Affiliate Marketing” (@alexeyalexeich), 2,818 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alexeyalexeich.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.