Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 57 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42–44 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Oct 2026, 22:01
44
+1
15 Aug 2026, 09:25
43
+1
10 Aug 2026, 17:15
42
no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:47
42
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11m 56s
Average length
1m 12s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
141 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
56
39.7%
🔥
47
33.3%
❤🔥
8
5.67%
👍
8
5.67%
🎉
7
4.96%
🥰
7
4.96%
🍾
3
2.13%
🎄
3
2.13%
🆒
1
0.709%
🤩
1
0.709%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 141 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2025 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Тип волос — не приговор! Или «хорошо там, где мы есть» 😉
Кудри «хотят» быть гладкими, прямые — кудрями, и так по кругу… И всё почему? Потому что особенности собственного типа волос мы редко считаем удобными. 🥴
Спешим напомнить: в большинстве случаев эти мучения решаются правильным подбором салонных и домашних процедур и средств. И кудри здесь — пожалуй, самый наглядный пример.
Уход за вьющимися волосами для многих…
☀️🧬 Загар, гены и витамин D: собрали всё, о чём вы боялись спросить (и несколько вещей, о которых даже не догадывались) 😉
◾️Почему одни на пляже становятся мулатками, а другие — пятнистым оленёнком?
Спойлер: это не кара небесная, а генетический расклад MC1R и компании.
◾️Если пить витамин D пачками, загар станет шоколадным и ровным?
◾️Почему в пасмурный день пигментное пятно тоже растёт как на дрожжах?
◾️RF-лифти…
Возможность отрастить действительно длинные волосы зависит от многих факторов. На что-то мы повлиять совсем не можем — например, на генетику.
А вот со всем остальным уже можно и нужно работать! Это качество питания, отсутствие стресса (или умение его компенсировать), здоровье кожи головы, инструмент, которым работает мастер, и, конечно же, средства для ухода и проведения салонных процедур.
Если ваша цель — коса до …
25 мая, Москва
Бизнес центр «ОСТАНКИНО»
Академия FRAMESI
ФОРМА, ФАКТУРА, ЦВЕТ
Трендовые стрижки в авторской технике BLUEPRINT от Алекса Датского.
➡️Четкая и быстрая техника стрижки, легко адаптируемая под любой тип волос;
➡️Навык работы с пропорциями и линиями для моделирования овала лица;
➡️Синергия формы и цвета;
➡️Принципы построения линий для гармоничного и комфортного отрастания;
➡️Предсказуемый результат …
ALEX BROS — ваша уверенность в красоте, здоровье и адекватности. Без компромиссов.
Соберём главное, что нужно знать о нас:
Пространство смыслов, а не трендов. Мы не бегаем за модой — мы выбираем стиль. В основе всего — фундаментальные знания, безопасность и результат, который остаётся с тобой надолго.
Волосы, кожа, ногти — комплексный подход. Стилисты-парикмахеры, косметология и ногтевой сервис в одном месте. От ст…
🧴 Межсезонье — испытание не только для иммунитета, но и для кожи головы.
Перепады температур, шапки, отопление в помещениях — всё это провоцирует сухость, стянутость и шелушения. А если добавить сюда регулярные походы в бассейн (хлорка 🏊♀️) или спортзал (перегрев и пот 💪), нагрузка становится колоссальной.
Итог? Дискомфорт, зуд и, как следствие, ослабление волос.
Как сохранить здоровье кожи головы без фанатизма? Сд…
Мечтаете об идеальных кудрях без пуха и сухости? ✨
Знакомьтесь, Curl Soul — специальная линия, которая дает кудрявым волосам всё, о чем они мечтают:
💧 Бескомпромиссное увлажнение
🌟 Идеальная структура
✨ Потрясающая гладкость
💟Но самый приятный сюрприз ждал нас во время тестов на тонких волосах! Вместо утяжеления мы получили неожиданный объем и приятную плотность. Теперь это must-have не только для пышных кудрей, но…
❤5🥰3❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alexbros_beauty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@alexbros_beauty named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@elyagencygroup named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Declared links
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AlexBros” (@alexbros_beauty), 44 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alexbros_beauty.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.