Channel
@alex_krasikov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
589subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002525208535 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alex_krasikov |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alex_krasikov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 589 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:09 | 591 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 589 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 588 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:09 | 588 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
401 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 184 | 45.9% | |
| 🔥 | 98 | 24.4% | |
| 👍 | 64 | 16.0% | |
| 😁 | 28 | 6.98% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 2.74% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 1.75% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 0.998% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 0.998% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.249% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 401 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2025 to 10 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The three websites In 2020, I discovered the JAMstack. A modern approach to building websites with a modern front-end stack. It was gaining momentum fast and it hit me really hard I had always loved marketing websites. The creativity, the storytelling, the way great teams turn a landing page into something that feels like art. But Wordpress was still king back then and I just couldn't stand it. It felt outdated, bl…
🔥23❤13👍4
SDKS: The final result Yeah, I didn't like the horizontal move, so had to restructure movements across the grid Usually I stick to the cubic family of easings. This time tried several options and stopped on custom one cubic-bezier(0.65, 0, 0.1, 1) This one makes a "snap" at the very beginning and really slows down to the end. Snap brings attention to the transition and very slow stop gives enough space to element …
❤15👍2
Export assets from Figma It sounds pretty simple, but to me exporting assets from Figma is one of the most complex tasks. And once done right, it can lift the overall quality of websites you build I already touched on this topic several times in posts on how misalignment affects svg export and the importance of adjusting image boxes to have the same height Here’s a quick study of how I approached this asset The …
❤10👏3🔥1
Next.js and Website performance I love Next.js for building websites. I've been using it for a while, it provides great defaults and performance optimization APIs But it ships ~100kb out of the box, which is a pretty strong performance overhead for the initial load. Tools like Astro and 11ty try to fix this problem by avoiding sending any JavaScript until you need it But during my career I've rarely found framewor…
❤16👍2
Here're some quick thoughts on Pixel Perfect First of all, I always use pixel perfect. Whether I'm trying to hit that 99% or not. And that also means I don't always hit 99% I work with designers I respect. I think they have better vision then I. I think they do design better then I do. I'm not considering making any adjustments to the design they made. I believe the design works as a whole thing and if I change any…
❤9👍8
Remembered an old joke from 2000s A designer comes to a developer and says: - I'm using Claude Code and I can't generate an app from a single prompt - So how does it work for you? - Well, first it comes out meh, I play around for a couple of days, explain every detail, build the app in small steps... takes weeks - Sounds about right, you're doing fine - But on social media people say they generate five apps with a o…
😁26👏4
What do you think about Pixel Perfect?
👎11👍9👌4💩4😐1
Operate website has been nominated for the Awwwards Honors https://www.awwwards.com/honors/product
🔥23
Be super careful with filter: blur() and backdrop-filter: blur() values over 20px It really hurts performance! 1. It affects page rendering. Several times I noticed that when I scroll into a section with heavy blur, the browser shows the lower half of the screen blank until it finishes drawing 2. Any transitions on top of blurred sections drop FPS 3. In the video you can even see a weird bug where the font render…
👍9🔥2
I started working with animations about three years ago By that point, I’d already been building frontends for a long time. I had a lot of experience with CSS, design systems, and UI in general, but animation-wise I’d mostly done basic stuff like button hovers and dialog appearance I didn’t find many truly useful resources, so most of my learning came from exploration: looking for opportunities, trying things, fail…
❤15👍3
Two years ago, over Christmas, I built an AI-powered marketing website generator I could’ve been a unicorn founder by now 😆
❤10🔥8😁2
Dashed If you need to implement a dashed border, CSS doesn’t provide a way to control dash and gap sizes. You only get the default behavior. Because of that, I often use SVG instead. It’s more verbose, but still pretty simple once you understand what’s going on <div class="relative px-4 py-3"> <svg class="pointer-events-none absolute top-[0.5px] left-[0.5px] size-[calc(100%-1px)] overflow-visible"> <rect …
❤27👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alex_krasikov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alex Krasikov” (@alex_krasikov), 589 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alex_krasikov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.