Channel
@alex_cryptomaestro_reviews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
375subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001633669763 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alex_cryptomaestro_reviews |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alex_cryptomaestro_reviews |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 375 | -4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 379 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:24 | 382 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:09 | 383 | -7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 390 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 392 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 392 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 6 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
🤑Premium members are making money worldwide While you sit and do nothing Why so? Ask yourself a question, what parts you from them 🤔 The answer is: NOTHING! They once’ve been on your place and now their life is changed Start changing yours now👇 😉😌😍🥰@alex_cryptomaestro
Want to experience the same? I’ve got something to offer you👇 ✅@alex_cryptomaestro
I analyze, I predict, I deliver. My Premium signals are backed by deep analytics for maximum accuracy📊 😉😌😍🥰@alex_cryptomaestro
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Every day 6 signals with GUARANTEED accuracy over 8️⃣5️⃣%👇👇👇👇👇 🟢 @alex_cryptomaestro
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @alex_cryptomaestro_reviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“REVIEWS | CRYPTO MAESTRO” (@alex_cryptomaestro_reviews), 375 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alex_cryptomaestro_reviews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.