Channel
@alenanafrilance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
201subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001682488499 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alenanafrilance |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alenanafrilance |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:56 | 201 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 204 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 205 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 205 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 23 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
70 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 30 | 42.9% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 30.0% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 27.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 October 2025 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😕 Я из тех людей, которые для похудения пробовали почти все, но каждый раз бросают… У меня зависает этот процесс. В прошлом году я занялась собой вплотную в июле. Бегала каждый день, по 5 кругов на школьном стадионе, пила мочегонный чай, принимала через день ванны с морской или магниевой солью, чтобы выводить отеки, делала безжалостный массаж, чтоб разгонять лимфу. А, ну еще убрала максимально белый хлеб, выпечку,…
👍1
🆘 SOS, друзья, выручайте! Делаю сложный запуск, и мне нужен хоть один живой человечек, представитель нашей ЦА, кто считает, что он с лишним весом и не может похудеть или долго не мог. В идеале - и девочка и мальчик, но хотя бы кто-то один. Нужны smmщики, фрилансеры, эксперты, все кто работает за монитором больше, чем двигается. Нам нужен поболтать 15 минут, понять механизмы, как включается самосаботаж при попытка…
Сегодня третий день, как Телеграм жутко блочат. Не загружается даже с vpn. Кто живой здесь остался? Маякните в комментах, чтоб не было так грустно 😞
👍2❤1
🔥 Почему твой контент-план пора выбросить в мусорку? Я тут годами веду экспертный блог, вымучиваю эти 3-4 поста или рилза, смотрю на ноль заявок, психую и бросаю к чертям кошачьим. И спокойненько ковыряюсь себе в задачах на позиции проджекта или контент-маркетолога, запускаю онлайн-школы и не парюсь насчет своего блога. А потом снова беру себя в руки и начинаю пилить контент. Нахрена? Зачем? Нам все мозги проклев…
🔥6
Вангую: в 2026 половина рынка вымрет (и слава Богу) Что-то я смотрю на происходящую дичь с запусками и понимаю — мы на пороге грандиозной чистки. Эра успешного успеха и прогревов по методичке, где ты три дня пляшешь в сторис, а потом открываешь продажи воздуха, заканчивается. Людей уже тошнит от пластиковых обещаний заработать миллион, ковыряясь в носу левой пяткой. Что нас ждет в 26-м? 1️⃣ Смерть запусков на кол…
❤6👍2
Posted without readable text
🙈 Сильнее всего я устаю от информационного перегруза Проснулась в 7.30, отвела ребенка в садик и на завтрак схавала информацию по 2 проектам. На одном - эзотерика, Таро и свечная магия, которые по сути то же самое, что родовые программы, психологи и многие коучи, тот же Павел Кочкин, только через другие инструменты. Выход из жертвы, управление реальностью, повышение дохода, налаживание отношений и подобное. В это…
❤4👍4🔥3
Не делайте эту ошибку, если не хотите сорвать вебинар 🖕
👍3
Video message, posted without a caption
В какие сказки вы верите?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🙃 Почему я в 2026 не советую продвигаться по блоговой модели? Читать всем, кто хочет заниматься своим делом, а не торчать сутками в соцсетях ради просмотров. Делать контент каждый день - лютая заёба, простите за мой французский. Как сейчас выглядит простейшая блоговая модель, по которой вы можете привлекать клиентов на онлайн-продукты? Нужно делать развлекательный контент на широкую нишу, который в то же время до…
🔥6❤3
Вы сейчас продаёте через вебинары или эфиры?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @alenanafrilance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В какие сказки вы верите?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вы сейчас продаёте через вебинары или эфиры?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 October 2025 to 10 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Инфобизнес без сыра|Алена Александрина” (@alenanafrilance), 201 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alenanafrilance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.