Ну значит ещё можно замутить движение! Сейчас выйду в ресурс и напишу
👍2

Channel
@alenaa_vasilek
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
341subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001497750116 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alenaa_vasilek |
| Created | Between 1 June 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alenaa_vasilek |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 341 | no change |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 341 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 23 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (23 April 2026 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 103 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
14 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 35.7% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 28.6% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 21.4% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ну значит ещё можно замутить движение! Сейчас выйду в ресурс и напишу
👍2
Девочки есть кто живой? Поставьте огоньки🔥
🔥4
Voice message, posted without a caption
Voice message, posted without a caption
Voice message, posted without a caption
Девочки увидела ваши вопросы, чуть позже на все отвечу))
Ну что девочки, новости последние: с сайта знакомств я удалилась через три дня! Потом, за это время я уже успела завершить курс «сила женского магнетизма» , где мы отлично проработали наши внутренние состояния и самоценность! Так же успела за это время купить квартиру, и сходить на три свидания с классными мужчинами)) Не со всеми хожу, веду отбор, и по этому могу много говорить, так как иногда просто устаю от таког…
❤1
Последнее время все чаще получаю сообщения с вопросом про отношения и реализацию: А я вижу другое: — страх быть невыбранной; — фоновую тревогу; — неясность своих способностей; — не понимание чего я действительно хочу; — и про то самое «я головой всё понимаю, но всё равно не делаю». Я вижу, насколько сильно сейчас женщинам не хватает не советов про «какой ты должна быть», а нормального, безопасного пространства. Мес…
❤1
Дорогие, желаю продуктивного дня всем! ✨ 22 мая ПЯТНИЦА Важных дел лучше не планировать, избегайте покупок на эмоциях и импульсивных решений. Хорошо заняться творчеством, пообщаться с детьми. Бережно к себе! 🩶 Многим женщинам зашла динамическая практика Кали медитация. Завтра мы с сокурсницей делаем ее для себя, но если есть желание присоединиться, Велком! Ставь + в комментариях и я расскажу подробности!
Правила игры просты: 1. Напиши в комментариях число от 1 до 10 — это твой личный код доступа. 2. Добавь смайлик, отражающий твоё текущее состояние (например, 😓, 🙏, 💪, 🍀). 3. Загадай тайное желание, связанное с твоей главной потребностью (без фанатизма, пусть Вселенная удивит!). Что произойдёт дальше? Через 2 дня я проведу специальную ченнелинговую практику и создам три уникальные медитации или саблиминала для трёх…
🎲 Игра «Создай свою магическую медитацию» Хочешь получить личную медитацию или саблиминал, идеально подходящий именно тебе? Тогда участвуй в моем творческом квесте!
Рекомендация от мужчины миллионера, у них все просто))) это мы тонкочувствуюшие существа Девочки😆
😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @alenaa_vasilek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АЛЁНА | СВЕТ ВНУТРИ ТЕБЯ” (@alenaa_vasilek), 341 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alenaa_vasilek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.