Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Алекс Мосаз

@aleksmodaily

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

581subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001515949038
TypeChannel
Username@aleksmodaily
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aleksmodaily

Growth

581582581.57 Aug 2026, 09:28 — 582 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:18 — 582 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:06 — 581 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:288 Aug 2026, 02:06
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 581–582 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 02:06581-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:18582no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:28582first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.1%
avg views ÷ 581 subscribers
Avg views / post
105
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held17 (4 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total944
Reactions total142
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

246 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6325.6%
💅4719.1%
3614.6%
❤‍🔥228.94%
custom 5190581961353081451176.91%
custom 5287504121794963292104.07%
🦄104.07%
custom 546977804559635490183.25%
custom 537082415517011545662.44%
👍62.44%
💯62.44%
👀52.03%
custom 528761812740686138341.63%
🤩31.22%
😍20.813%
😁10.407%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aleksmodaily. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC53 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Перед сном написал GPT, будто случайно нашёл телефон Алекса и пытаюсь понять, что это был за человек. Получился интересный промпт. Вот что ответил GPT: «Алексей Мосаз, которого многие знали как Алекс Мо, был человеком, который удивительным образом совмещал инженера и гуманитария. Формально он строил IT-продукты, помогал предпринимателям, занимался аналитикой, автоматизацией и изучением искусственного интеллекта. О

6

30 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC79 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У нас тут вторую ночь прилетают ночевать парочка нектарниц. Какая символическая милота 💀 p.s. качество пострадало от ночной съёмки. Свет от уличного фонаря 😌

7❤‍🔥4🔥2😍2💅1

30 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC80 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ты никогда не будешь готов. Наш мозг — очень интересная штука, которой мы не всегда способны управлять. Именно поэтому меня очень вдохновляют всякие исследования в области нейронауки. Но не углубляясь в объяснение причин, а смотря на срез десятков прожитых лет, осознаёшь, что все когда-либо принятые решения не были приняты из позиции "готов к этому решению", а скорее наоборот. Наш мозг любит безопасность и вопрос

9💅2🔥2🦄1

23 Jul 2026, 15:27 UTC114 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Когда спросили как дела... За более чем год плотной работы в маркетинг-аналитике и разработке безвылазно 25/8, я чуть разучился говорить вживую (не буквами в мессенджере) Да, когда разговор сразу же в ключе бизнес-процессов и задач, мозг становится на рельсы и озвучивает всё, что происходит в мозгу, иногда чуть съезжая с рельс. А если мы говорим об общих каких-то темах, обычное такое общение не о данных, мой мозг

5🔥4custom 54697780455963549013💅2❤‍🔥1🦄1

23 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC108 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Лекции по продукту, автоматизации, маркетингу и аналитике Проводил ревизию каналов и увидел, что некоторые старые лекции по автоматизации начали набирать стремительно обороты. Появляются комментарии и на тг-канал подписалось несколько человек с видео. Привет, ребят! Я вас видел :) Спасибо за подписку ❤️ Лекции обязательно продолжатся, как только я завершу весь основной пласт работ по Флаите и передам техническое у

❤‍🔥6💅3🔥32🦄1

22 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC116 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Создание Telegram ботов бесплатно Ни для кого не секрет, что на базе аналитической системы Флаита строился и продолжает строиться чат-бот конструктор. Enterprise клиентам уже были успешно внедрены сценарии в ручном режиме, но Флаита стремится к самостоятельной работе клиентами с ботами. Долгое время я допиливал функционал и есть ещё что поделать, что я с радостью передам будущему разработчику, но уже в ближайшие д

🔥8💅3🤩3🦄2

20 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC127 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Каждый год, вот уже как 6 лет на мой день рождения выпадают какие-то поездки. В этом году не исключение. Обновляли визовый вопрос с решением закрывать юридическое лицо в этой юрисдикции, так как оно не подходит под историю развития компании и на выходе получается избыточным. 13 лет назад, когда была своя студия, это было логичным. Сегодня это оказалось дорогим способом ведения деятельности. Подробнее расскажу в бу

❤‍🔥8💅6custom 546977804559635490131

18 Jul 2026, 11:39 UTC131 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

38. едем дальше

🔥10💅7custom 52875041217949632926custom 537082415517011545632

16 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC136 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Когда “бутиковость” превращается в зависимость В последнее время я встречаюсь уже не с первым проектом, где собственная или кастомно разработанная платформа для клиента становится не активом, а спорной и высокорисковой точкой в экономике компании. На бумаге всё выглядит красиво, а где красиво не делали, да?) ✅ Есть уникальная платформа. ✅ Есть подрядчик или команда, которая её разработала. ✅ Есть поддержка. ✅ Е

🔥5custom 52876181274068613833💯21💅1custom 54697780455963549011

15 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC101 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Самый обидный факап, который повторялся уже несколько раз — записывать скринкаст видео и не заметить, что отвалился микрофон. В итоге на обработке видоса увидеть, что аудио-дорожка съебалась и весь скринкаст можно выкидывать в мусорку, так как переозвучивать тяжелее, чем записать новый скринкаст. 😀😎🔥 ✨💥💫 ⚡🌈🧩

custom 52875041217949632924💅1😁1

15 Jul 2026, 13:26 UTC112 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Все уже заценили обновление в каналах?

👀5💅1

13 Jul 2026, 11:33 UTC116 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот это меня вчера вырубило. Настолько вырубило, что я проснулся сегодня уверенный в том, что сегодня четверг. Серьёзно)) Давно я так долго не спал. 10 часов. Вероятно впервые за этот год и вероятно для подготовки к новому спринту. Эта неделя будет максимально насыщенной по событиям. 1. Я продолжаю встречаться с сильными разработчиками, погружая в собственные процессы, процессы Флаиты. Безумно рад знакомству с те

💅4🔥1custom 51905819613530814511

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @aleksmodaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 413,420 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алекс Мосаз” (@aleksmodaily), 581 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aleksmodaily.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.