Channel
@aleksawinph
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
117subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001736044294 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aleksawinph |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aleksawinph |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 117 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 118 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 119 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 118 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 116 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 116 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 115 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 22 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
101 reactions across 3 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5462946827097640918 | 46 | 45.5% | |
| custom 5463006565797761712 | 21 | 20.8% | |
| custom 5462978876143604745 | 14 | 13.9% | |
| custom 5226675620968164037 | 12 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5226503783621619530 | 5 | 4.95% | |
| custom 5463092636942374253 | 2 | 1.98% | |
| custom 5470073977433003225 | 1 | 0.99% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Спасибо всем, кто откликнулся, удалось восстановить доступ до того, как меня заблочили за подозрительную активность (столько паролей перепробовала) Выдохнула💅 Мои портреты сделанные совместно с @extraxs для конкурса с заданием «автопортрет фотографа», последнее фото вайб сегодняшнего дня 🖤
custom 546294682709764091817custom 52266756209681640375custom 54630065657977617125custom 54630926369423742532
Походу кое-кто инстаграма лишился💅🤩 У кого есть опыт восстановления доступа без знания пароля и отсутствия кодов на почте и номеру телефона, буду рада послушать)
Md: Дарья Азиатцева Hair: Лилия Филиппова Mua: Ксения Никандрова Org: Илона Балицкая Ph: me
custom 546294682709764091819custom 52266756209681640377custom 54629788761436047457custom 52265037836216195302
Muah&style: @extraxs Ph: me
custom 546300656579776171216custom 546294682709764091810custom 54629788761436047457custom 52265037836216195303custom 54700739774330032251
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @aleksawinph. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aleksa.win” (@aleksawinph), 117 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aleksawinph.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.