4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,534–1,549 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 23:15
1,536
-8
10 Aug 2026, 00:28
1,544
-3
6 Aug 2026, 20:01
1,547
no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:52
1,547
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.8%
avg views ÷ 1,536 subscribers
Avg views / post
196
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
11 (27 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
2,157
Reactions total
68
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 21s
Average length
2m 11s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
68 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
27
39.7%
❤🔥
18
26.5%
👏
12
17.6%
⚡
5
7.35%
💔
3
4.41%
custom 5273769559411662435
1
1.47%
💯
1
1.47%
🤔
1
1.47%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Это проблема! Куда бы его направить, чтоб отстал?!48%
Да пусть пресмыкается29%
Нет, пусть сам найдёт43%
Сама им займусь0%
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ДЕВОЧКИ, ВОПРОС!
Вот вы стали развиваться, ходить на всякие практики\тренинги\терапию, открыли свои желания, вкус жизни, стали понимать разницу между "хочу" и "надо".
А мужчина остался без изменений.
Ты подошла раз и сказала "вот я хожу на практики, может тебе тоже?"
Подошла два... три...
Он покивал.
А через три года ты потеряла к нему всякое влечение. При этом любовь может быть даже осталась, но ты уже не можеш…
КРАСОТКА КОТОРАЯ ТЕБЯ ХОЧЕТ И ВЕДЁТ СЕБЯ ИДЕАЛЬНО
Попросил мужчин с курса по мышлению написать ассоциации на такую ситуацию. Всё что у них вспыхивает: эмоции, чувства, слова, имена, характеристики - вообще всё.
Каждый раз такое начинается...
"Не верю, боюсь, здесь есть подвох" и т.п.
При том что я отбираю мужчин интеллектуальных, с закрытой жизненной базой - крепко стоящих на ногах, вполне из себя что-то представл…
Дайджест постов за июль которые стоит перечитать (месяц профессиональной жести)
Добиваться женщину во что бы то ни стало - невроз или враньё?
https://t.me/aleks_primo/1884
Дыры в логике эксперта по отношениям
https://t.me/aleks_primo/1885
Панический страх отношений
https://t.me/aleks_primo/1888
Уязвимость как концепция🤮
https://t.me/aleks_primo/1889
Уязвимость для мужчины
https://t.me/aleks_primo/1902
Вонь рынк…
В запретограмме публикую всякое по своим темам. Сегодня про методику схожую с гипнооргазмом, которую вы дома можете попробовать.
Профиль активно растёт, найдете там много интересного по теме гипноза, сексологии и эволюционной психологии.
Под некоторыми видео большой срач, например под этим 30к просмотров и люди 4 дня активно ругались друг с другом без моего участия.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Da-bONFif_k/?igsh=…
Просвящение в сфере отношений и секса это коммерческий рынок...
Вот так открытие неожиданное?
Ах ожиданное и очевидное!
Ну ладно, а давай тогда порассуждаем. Цели какие?
У обучения - цель научить.
У рынка - цель продать и желательно продолжать продавать и продавать. Фактически развести и доить.
Цели разные, считай что не связанные. У обучения и просвящения цель понятная и благородная, её можно не разбирать.
Цел…
1го августа старт курса по мышлению для мужчин.
Последние шансы вписаться.
Ты больше никогда не окажешься в ситуации уязвимости, боли из-за отношений, ситуации когда у тебя нет выбора, тебе будут прямым текстом говорить, что хотят тебя, ты будешь получать комменты. Ты перестанешь понимать проблемы других мужчин. Женщины станут логичными, понятными и не вызывать никаких вопросов и недоумения.
Без фишек, без манипуля…
НУЖДА В ПОДДЕРЖКЕ. Продолжаем тему уязвимости.
Пост может показаться жестоким на фоне того, что вы привыкли видеть на эту тему в психологическом пространстве. Я не буду оперировать моральными и человечными понятиями, я обращусь к морфологии психики опирающейся на биологические потребности.
Отвечаю на комментарий:
Это насколько надо быть...странным человеком, чтобы считать, что существует кто то всегда знающий как п…
УЯЗВИМОСТЬ для мужчины в отношениях.
Разбор будет крайне мерзкий и неприятный ⬇️
Откройся своей партнёрше, покажи ей свои слабости, поной и тогда у вас наступит гармония в отношениях и это научит женщину заботиться о тебе...
На коллег, которые советуют подобное я смотрю с высоко поднятыми бровями и недоумением. А советуют что-то такое "не только лишь все".
Как бы объяснить, да чтоб доходчиво и без мата...
Это та…
Пока пишу продолжение про уязвимость и тихонько собираю материал для книги, напомню, что в сентябре будет практический курс для мастеров.
Состоит из очной отработки с 10 до 17ч четыре дня подряд и самостоятельного освоения теории онлайн по видео (в записи).
Курс рассчитан только на помогающих практиков, которые имеют какую-то свою базу работы с людьми (психолог, энергопрактик, кинезиолог и т.п.) - школа и модальнос…
❤🔥1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @aleks_primo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Это проблема! Куда бы его направить, чтоб отстал?!48%
Да пусть пресмыкается29%
Нет, пусть сам найдёт43%
Сама им займусь0%
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 209,707 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Архитектор Состояний - Александр Бодров” (@aleks_primo), 1,536 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aleks_primo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.