Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

A.LIST

@alcorating

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,160subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001817526840
TypeChannel
Username@alcorating
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alcorating

Growth

3,1603,1683,1646 August 2026 — 3,168 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,168 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,166 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,160 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,159–3,169 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:453,160-6
9 Aug 2026, 04:123,166-2
6 Aug 2026, 12:233,168no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:013,168first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.7%
avg views ÷ 3,160 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (30 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total13,898
Reactions total267
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

411 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍29371.3%
4510.9%
🔥174.14%
92.19%
🤔92.19%
🕊81.95%
👏71.70%
😱61.46%
🤝61.46%
🤷‍♂30.73%
😍20.487%
🍾10.243%
👌10.243%
👎10.243%
💘10.243%
🙈10.243%
🤨10.243%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 451reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC331 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ЛВИ теряют темп. Первый сигнал был в июне. Рост продаж ЛВИ замедлился до 4,4% к прошлому году после 13,4% в первом квартале. Теперь пришли данные производства за июль. После пяти месяцев роста производство ЛВИ снова ушло в минус — на 3,1% к июлю прошлого года. В июне оно ещё росло на 8,9%. Само по себе производство о спросе ничего не говорит. Компании могут сокращать выпуск, распродажу запасов никто не отменял. П

👍63

3 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC900 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пьём меньше, выбираем иначе Сегодня вышли два материала, которые стоит читать вместе. «РБК Вино» разбирает причины снижения потребления алкоголя в России. В 2025 году показатель снизился до 8,06 л чистого спирта на человека. Оценка на 2026-й — 7,77 л, минимум с конца 1990-х. Нынешнее снижение началось не вчера. Это долгосрочный тренд, внутри которого в 2023–2024 годах произошёл скачок продаж. В 2025-м и первой полов

👍10🔥5🤝4🕊1

31 Jul 2026, 07:33 UTC≈1,060 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

К статье «Коммерсантъ»: Выдержанный ответ. Речь не об уходе армянских напитков из России. Товары продаются. Но уже можно оценить, что рынок почти не заметит, а что заменить будет сложнее. Министр экономического развития России Максим Решетников считает, что Россия без труда заместит армянские товары, если их поставки сократятся. Для экономики в целом это, вероятно, так. Но на алкогольном рынке картина сложнее. В 2

👍17🕊1🙈1

28 Jul 2026, 10:15 UTC≈1,170 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В дополнение к материалу о текущих продажах Cognac AOC в мире уточним "вес" коньячных домов из «большой четвёрки» в общем объёме рынка. На Hennessy приходится ориентировочно 53%, на Martell — 16%, на Rémy Martin — 11%, на Courvoisier — 6%; вместе они занимают около 86% мирового объёма и почти 91% рынка в денежном выражении. BNIC не публикует единой актуальной разбивки по домам, поэтому часть долей — оценка A.LIST на

👍192👌1

28 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC≈1,220 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Трубка, скрипка, безупречная логика — привычный образ Шерлока Холмса. Уже в первом рассказе о Шерлоке Холмсе Конан Дойл упоминает стоящие в гостиной на Бейкер-стрит погребец со спиртным и газоген — домашний аппарат для приготовления содовой. В русских переводах эта выразительная деталь почти исчезла, а позже была изменена до неузнаваемости. Между тем именно она помогает понять, что пили на Бейкер-стрит. Обычно для и

👍222

27 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,380 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Cognac AOC: одна стена, четыре разные вмятины Мировые отгрузки коньяка в 2025 году упали на 15,1%, выручка - на 25,3%. Отскок в начале 2026-го на этом фоне пока не разворот, а один удачный квартал. Большая четвёрка переживает один и тот же обвал по-разному. Новый материал - о том, как падение влияет на продажи Rémy, Hennessy, Martell и Courvoisier, почему индустрия ищет выход в новых продуктах для новой аудитории и

👍234🕊3

24 Jul 2026, 06:17 UTC≈1,530 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Даже беглого взгляда на полку достаточно, чтобы узнать Johnnie Walker, Absolut или Grant’s - читать этикетку не нужно. Как создавали узнаваемый образ этих и других брендов — в новом материале A.LIST.

👍226😍2🍾1💘1

22 Jul 2026, 12:30 UTC≈1,580 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На рынке крепкого алкоголя достаточно и статистики, и рейтингов. A.LIST свою нишу занял и будет стараться её удержать: фокус остаётся на анализе перспектив развития, а не только на подведении итогов. Формат проекта меняться не будет. В сети много проектов, составляющих рейтинги лучших напитков. За одними стоит методическая работа, другие решают рекламную задачу. Разница между ними для читателя не всегда очевидна. По

👍154🔥32

20 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC≈1,340 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Иностранные компании ушли из России. Их виски — нет. Без прежнего маркетинга и привычной системы поставок продажи семи крупнейших импортных марок выросли на 29,3%. Российские сети ничего нового не изобрели. Покупатель тоже. Почему знакомые марки продолжают расти почти без участия своих владельцев и есть ли шанс у российского виски — в расширенном комментарии A.LIST к материалу «Коммерсанта»: Новый импорт, старый выбо

👍185🔥3

17 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,390 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Компании любят рейтинги. Особенно рейтинги про «успешный успех», а не про то, как компания скатилась из первой десятки. Место в списке превращается в пресс-релиз, слайд для партнёров и законный повод напомнить рынку о себе. Ничего предосудительного: хороший результат нуждается во внешнем подтверждении. Именно поэтому даю ссылку на новый рейтинг крупнейших производителей алкоголя Forbes. Данные «Клуба миллионеров A.L

👍15

16 Jul 2026, 09:16 UTC≈1,400 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Рынок разбирает первую десятку Пока рынок рос, слабые результаты терялись на фоне общего подъёма. Сейчас рынок падает, кредиты дорогие, а сети хотят от поставщика всё и сразу: промо, бесперебойные поставки и маржу. Полка, как выяснилось, не благотворительная организация и отечественного производителя поддерживать не нанималась. По итогам первого полугодия 2026 года сопоставимый рынок крепкого алкоголя просел на 0,

👍1174

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @alcorating. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 314,542 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“A.LIST” (@alcorating), 3,160 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alcorating.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.