🪻
custom 54340536329096619045custom 54022004159807688493custom 52832452279292574752custom 53665208470476081961

Channel
@albinaborchan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
75subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003083307281 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @albinaborchan |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/albinaborchan |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 02:57 | 75 | +1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 74 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 73 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 72 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 72 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
73 reactions across 5 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5283245227929257475 | 15 | 20.5% | |
| custom 5435971121058947749 | 15 | 20.5% | |
| custom 5402200415980768849 | 12 | 16.4% | |
| custom 5434053632909661904 | 10 | 13.7% | |
| 💋 | 7 | 9.59% | |
| custom 5330211992391141488 | 6 | 8.22% | |
| custom 5287238705700961176 | 5 | 6.85% | |
| custom 5188678809804624209 | 2 | 2.74% | |
| custom 5366520847047608196 | 1 | 1.37% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🪻
custom 54340536329096619045custom 54022004159807688493custom 52832452279292574752custom 53665208470476081961
и снова в краснодаре 😍
custom 52832452279292574755custom 54022004159807688493custom 53302119923911414882custom 54340536329096619041
🌻
custom 54359711210589477498custom 54340536329096619044custom 52832452279292574753custom 54022004159807688492
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52872387057009611765custom 53302119923911414884custom 54022004159807688494custom 51886788098046242091
между небом и тишиной
💋7custom 54359711210589477497custom 52832452279292574755custom 51886788098046242091
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @albinaborchan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DMITRIEVNA” (@albinaborchan), 75 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/albinaborchan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.