2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29–31 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 04:02
30
no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:17
30
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
391.7%
avg views ÷ 30 subscribers
Avg views / post
118
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held
13 (28 May 2026 – 28 July 2026)
Views total
705
Reactions total
34
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
570
Videos
1
Links
13
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
93 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😈
36
38.7%
❤🔥
20
21.5%
🔥
19
20.4%
❤
9
9.68%
😭
5
5.38%
👀
1
1.08%
💔
1
1.08%
💘
1
1.08%
🙏
1
1.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Знакомлю вас с новым скелетиком
его зовут Шугар
его особенности:
1. может лечиться и стать сильнее во время боя когда съест сахар
2. может питаться сахаром как обычной едой и получать питательные вещества из сахара
3. после него остаётся шлейф сахара(шучу, не шлейф, вы просто увидите следы из пары рисинок сахара)
4. у него принт кубика сахара на футболке
мини преда: чувачок достаточно хороший боец, согласился всту…
У меня уже наверно месяц точно лежит эта картинка и мне дали разрешения ее выложить, так что
https://t.me/art_by_vis
https://t.me/gaxgmertz4
Две милых девочки во вселенной Труська и Чулко, прям в стилистике сериала. Да я запарилась и мне нравится результат на самом деле. Да и стиль достаточно у сериала интересный (там еще моя девочка затесалась, но это просто перерисовка кадра была)
Кто кого в заложниках держит? Это я в заложниках 😭😭😭😭
Контекст: я наскетчила 152 фрейма на комикс (там его обвести осталось, но нам новый хочется начать)
Сегодня вышла последняя серия УЦЦ и честно успела глянуть ее прямо перед работой (что удивительно, потому что встаю я последнее время с огромным трудом)
Честно, сериал мне нравится, поэтому может я просто его пересмотрю как-нибудь еще.
Что по поводу концовки? Как будто мне было это неожиданно, но все равно интересно…. (Хотя некоторые моменты заставили охренеть)
Небольшие скетчики с моей любимой полиаморией
То чувство, когда реально много ешь сладкого и даже вымышленный злой еж, напоминает, что много такого «жрать нельзя!»
И да…. ПЕРВЫЙ ПОЦЕЛУЙ ЗА ПОЛГОДА (Я напомню, что рисую свою девочку и Силкадума уже полгода)
Стресс стрессом, а работа по расписанию
Наш магазин (Читай город я напомню) участвует в акции "свидание с книгой в слепую" и задание было украсить книги
Прилогаю то как украсила книги, но что за книги я не признаюсь, извините :)
Так же там видно немного книг моей коллеги.
Итак: у меня произошёл огромный стресс (слишком огромный для меня просто) из-за которого я просто в очень сильно подвешенном моральном состоянии. Ничего не хочется. Ничего толком и не делается.
Поэтому пока я хочу немного попробовать придти в себя... и возможно продолжить творить. Но пока это спорная штука
Channel name was changed to «Надо как-то следить за прогрессом рисунков/ Тревожный художник/ Рест пока не знаю насколько»
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @alarmingartist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 731,620 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Надо как-то следить за прогрессом рисунков/ Тревожный художник/ Рест пока не знаю насколько” (@alarmingartist), 30 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alarmingartist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
