Channel
@alamarydxn6
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
738subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001108639757 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alamarydxn6 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 16 November 2018— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alamarydxn6 |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 5 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @alamarydxn6/95 · this entry27 Jan 2021, 13:39 UTC | @alamarydxn7/3927 Jan 2021, 13:40 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @alamarydxn7/4030 Jan 2021, 05:21 UTC | @alamarydxn6/96 · this entry30 Jan 2021, 05:21 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @alamarydxn7 | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @alamarydxn7 (7–3) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 16 November 2018 to 12 December 2024. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @alamarydxn6 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 738 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:40 | 740 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 740 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 November 2018 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
لحضه لحضه لحضه ركز معي نص دقيقه فقط 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼 مطلوب 10 مسوقين جادين لمكتب سفريات يقدم خدمات الفيزا والسفر وفرص العمل في السعودية المكتب مرخص ومقرة في قلب العاصمة صنعاء ويعمل منذ 8 سنوات عمولات مجزية عن كل شخص ياخذ فيزه انت تاخذ عمولتك مني انا شخصيا سلم الزبون وخذ عمولتك وهذه فرصة عمل قوية جدا وملموسة مافي داعي للشركات الوهمية وايداع الاموال ورأس المال ومدري وش هات الزبون وخذ فلوسك حواله نجم او خذها من الم…
https://t.me/alamarydxn/420 مهم لكل تائه لا يعرف مالذي يفعله كي تنتظم حياته لانطلاقة جديدة
5 أيام تفصلنا عن انطلاق الدورة التدريبية الخاصة بسوق الفوركس اليوم نبدأ استقبال الرسوم احجز مقعدك واحصل على *ضمان ذهبي* 🩵🩵🩵 *الضمان الذهبي* 🩵🩵🩵 هو ان تحضر معنا اول 3 محاضرات وفي حال لم تجد فائدة وقررت الانسحاب فكل ماعليك ان تقدم طلب اعادة الرسوم سنعيدها اليك وفوقها اعتذار ❤️💜 نحن نعرف مالذي نتحدث عنه احبتي قوة الدورة لاتحتاج ترويج او كثرة منشورات http://t.me/aborasmhmmd
مميزات الدورة التدريبية الدورة تعليم احترافي عن التداول على البورصة العالمية فوركس بيع وشراء العملات الاجنبية والمعادن والاسهم والسلع في هذه الدورة ستتعلم التداول بنفسك ومن هاتفك وحسابك عندك لاتقم بالايداع لاي احد ولا تستثمر فلوسك عند احد لا ابدا فلوسك في جيبك في محفظتك الاستثمارية ✅ستتعلم عبر محاضرات مباشرة اون لاين ومسجلة مرئية ومسموعة فيها كل المعلومات التي تلزمك للدخول الى هذا العالم ✅ستتعلم كيفية ادارة المخاط…
السلام عليكم اخي هناك شخص يدعوني للاستثمار في بامب او عملات رقمية اذا اشتركت ب20دولار ساحصل على 200 دولار 💲 خلال 24 ساعة ههههههههه الجواب خلي بالك من نفسك ولا تقع في فخاخ قديمة جدا وقع بها الكثير ممن قبلك والكثير منهم تجاهلو نصيحتنا لهم خلي بالك من جيبك ومحفظتك
بالمناسبة سيبلغك النصاب انك ربحت ولكن تحتاج رسوم تخرجها لحسابك وهنا يبدأ الابتزاز كلما تحول سيكون هناك عذر جديد حتى يتم شفط جيبك نهائيا ثم يقوم بحظرك ونت بلط البحر 😂😂😄😄😄😄😄😄 هذي الاشكال سوي لهم حظر بدون ماترد عليه
نحذر من شركة كيونت قد نصبو سابقا والان جايبين مجتمع جديد وبداية جديده وجب التحذير
https://t.me/+uQ0jvIHzGPE2ZjBk
للاخوه اللي حابين يدخلو تداول بانفسهم نقدم توصيات مدفوعة تداول بنفسك حسب التوصيات اللي ننزلها لك بشكل يومي وتابع معنا تحديثات السوق اول باول نهاية الاسبوع تحول نصف الارباح بدون قيد او شرط او اشتراك شهري 100 دولار نصف سنوي 300 دولار سنوي 400 دولار اشتراك دائم 500 دولار اول اسبوع تجربة مجانية نسبة نجاح الصفقات تصل الى 90% لمن يرغب التواصل على الخاص @aborasmhmmd او الوتساب +967771715382 محفظتك بيديك ولا تدفع اشتر…
https://t.me/+vwNh9_6XJxw4NDI8 قناتي الخاصة بتعليم التداول مجااااااانا دمتم سالمين😘
7000 مشاهدة 1200 مستثمر بفضل الله 💚💚💚💚💚💚
https://chat.whatsapp.com/HQZbzk0ePVsBNKbTHmm1f5 تقديم الحلول الامثل لتداول اكثر أمان واكثر ربحية هذا فريق سوري محترف متابعهم منذ 5 شهور نتائج مبهره بصراحة اللي حاب يدخل معهم له الحرية
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alamarydxn6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,157,204 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@alamarydxn6 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دورة التعريف بالمنتجات الشامل dxn” (@alamarydxn6), 738 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alamarydxn6.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.