Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Al-Mubashiraat 2.0

Channel

Al-Mubashiraat 2.0

@al_mubashirat

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

266subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001699391471
TypeChannel
Username@al_mubashirat
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/al_mubashirat

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25426626012 August 2026 — 257 subscribers13 August 2026 — 257 subscribers21 August 2026 — 254 subscribers29 August 2026 — 258 subscribers7 September 2026 — 261 subscribers14 September 2026 — 266 subscribers12 August 202614 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 252–268 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 07:39266+5
7 Sept 2026, 12:21261+3
29 Aug 2026, 02:34258+4
21 Aug 2026, 08:08254-3
13 Aug 2026, 09:14257no change
12 Aug 2026, 17:32257first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1083.3%
👍18.33%
🤣18.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 22:18 UTC50 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

A brother with ʿilm said about this: “Allah knows best. Perhaps it is a فتح (opening/victory) and facilitation for the sisters, and the banners—perhaps the one who will establish a new beginning will be the sons of the sisters, the young lion cubs. And Allah knows best. They are the front, even if it is delayed. But, with the help of Allah تعالى, it will be established.”

3

11 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC57 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

A Dream about a Soon Opening A young boy in Shaam narrates: "I saw a dream after fajr, that the sisters from Roj are making takbirat Meanwhile there's an ongoing war between the muslimeen and the enemy and the sisters are free to leave where there want and they spread in the different places and cities. I see myself with the other boys and were preparing flags of tawheed writing the kalima of tawheed on them, then

2

7 Aug 2026, 01:17 UTC116 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

A Dream about the Prisoners in Iraq A Sister in Shaam narrates: "I had a dream a month ago about our brothers (the ones who got transferred to iraq). I saw few of them and it was night and I saw how there is an ocean in front of them. The brothers jumped inside the water to reach the other side As I said, it was very few brothers, they were swimming and no one drowned. Then all of sudden I am in a garden and the b

3

4 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC121 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Idk which dream he is referring to, but we will try our best posting some of the dreams regarding al Jazirah we find on his page ان شاء الله .

2

4 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC120 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

A Munaasir حفظه الله commented in a group in Element on the matter of the many dreams about the opening of Jazirah, he was specifically asked about the year he thinks the opening will be, as theres many dreams he posted which hinted to 2030 "The dates are speculative... and there will be a rule in the Land of the Two Holy Sanctuaries, similar to Mosul, بإذن الله. After some time But for a short period, for the ene

👍1

4 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC99 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026

It doesn't mean its going to be this year or the next, but it will certainly be during this time of ours. Maybe another five or ten years. Maybe more or maybe less. Regardless Allah is preparing the believers for victory and he is likewise preparing the areas.

4 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC102 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

It is not the first time someone has fled the Saudi regime. Over the past three or four years, I have seen many people with large followings speak out about the dhulm after leaving the country. Even though many of these individuals have major misunderstandings in manhaj—some of them even considering British law to be more just than Saudi law etc—they are some khayr in them, opposite to the silent shayateen or the su

2 Aug 2026, 03:05 UTCviews —

Al-Mubashiraat 2.0 pinned «☁️ Posting dreams connected to the end of times 🗞 Sharing important events & current affairs 🕊 Sharing dream interpretations [Mubashirat : Glad tidings] Main channel: https://t.me/al_mubashirat Archive with the guide: https://t.me/Al_MubashiraatArchive»

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @al_mubashirat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Al-Mubashiraat 2.0” (@al_mubashirat), 266 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/al_mubashirat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.