Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Al Ittihad

@al_ittihad

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,123subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001380017903
TypeChannel
Username@al_ittihad
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/al_ittihad

Growth

4,1234,1314,1276 August 2026 — 4,131 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,131 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,130 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,123 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,122–4,132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 06:464,123-7
6 Aug 2026, 05:104,130-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:174,131no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:064,131first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.46%
avg views ÷ 4,123 subscribers
Avg views / post
102
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held22 (4 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total2,234
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤨337.5%
🖕225.0%
112.5%
👍112.5%
🤣112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC61 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

The first team celebrates the renewal of contracts for (Housawi - Flateh). 🟡⚫️

8 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC77 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 🟡 Al-Ittihad Club squad for the next season (so far): • Moussa Diaby • Steven Bergwijn • Roger Fernandes • Ahmed Al-Ghamdi • Abdulrahman Al-Aboud • Marwan Al-Suwailem • Saif Hosawi

🤨2

7 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC115 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨🚨🚨 Sports News — majed_ma_10: The management of #Al-Ittihad club has received a request from NEOM to obtain the services of Faisal Al-Gamdi on a loan basis.

7 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC120 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 After the end of three seasons with #AlIttihad... What is your most cherished memory with captain Fabinho? 🟡⚫️

7 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC113 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨🚨🚨🚨🗣️ Fabinho: Al-Ittihad will always remain in my heart. 💛🖤

1

7 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC99 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨🗣️ Dion Lopy - Media Center: I have visited the Kingdom twice before, but that was a long time ago. I came with the national team to play friendly matches. When I arrived, I found the country exactly as I had imagined it. The people are very kind, and the country is wonderful. The people are honorable and hospitable. I know the country a little bit from before, so coming back here is a great pleasure for me. 🇸🇦

7 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC94 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨🗣️ Dion Lopy - Media Center: I told my parents even before signing the contract. I spoke with them and told them that I was in contact with the #Al-Ittihad club and that things were going well. My mother was very happy, and then I spoke with my brothers, and everyone was happy for me.

7 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC91 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨🗣️ Dion Lopy - Media Center: They told me about the club's project, and I've seen videos of the stadium and the fans. I'm very happy to be here. I'm extremely excited and have positive feelings about joining, and I hope to contribute a lot to the team and the fans. 🟡⚫️

7 Aug 2026, 06:21 UTC109 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨🗣️ Dion Lopy – Media Center: My primary goal is to help the team achieve championships with all my strength. This is a historic and prestigious club that always strives to win titles. I am here to utilize all my experience to motivate my teammates and push the team to achieve all our goals. 🟡⚫️ Thoughts?

🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @al_ittihad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 228,136 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Al Ittihad” (@al_ittihad), 4,123 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/al_ittihad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.