Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AlBaseerah

Channel

AlBaseerah

@alBaseeroh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,030subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001437490351
TypeChannel
Username@alBaseeroh
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alBaseeroh

Growth

2,0302,0392,034.56 August 2026 — 2,039 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,039 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,037 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,032 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,030 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,029–2,040 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 02:542,030-2
12 Aug 2026, 21:022,032-5
10 Aug 2026, 05:112,037-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:422,039no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:152,039first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.55%
avg views ÷ 2,030 subscribers
Avg views / post
113
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (25 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,254
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 37s
Average length
3m 37s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC62 viewsread 7 August 2026

PRAYING MAGHRIB BEHIND THE ONE PRAYING ISHA Shaykh Ibn Uthaymīn (may ALLĀH have mercy on him) said: "The correct view is that if a person comes (to the mosque) and the imam is praying Isha, whether he is with a group or not, he should join the imam, with the intention of praying Maghrib. It does not matter if the imam’s intention is different from that of one who is praying behind him, because the Prophet (ﷺ) said:

Signed AlBaseerah Institute

5 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC77 viewsread 7 August 2026

WHEN SHOULD PROSTRATION OF FORGETFULNESS BE DONE? In the Name of Allāh, the Entirely Gracious, the Exclusively Merciful 📩 Question: The questioner asks: should the prostration of forgetfulness be done before the salaam or after the salaam? 📝 The answer: The scholars differed as to when the prostration should be done before the salaam and when it should be done after the salaam. And the preponderant position is t

Signed AlBaseerah Institute

4 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC82 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

LENIENCY AND WISDOM IN DA'WAH ALLĀH says, كَذَٰلِكَ كُنتُم مِّن قَبۡلُ فَمَنَّ ٱللَّهُ عَلَيۡكُمۡ You were initially like them; then ALLĀH favoured you ˹with Islam˺. That is, just as HE guided you after you had been astray, HE may also guide others; just as guidance was a gradual process for you, it may also be like that for others. So the one who is perfect should look at how he was before he was perfect, and thi

Signed AlBaseerah Institute

3 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC83 viewsread 7 August 2026

THE TRIALS OF DYING Shaykh Ibn Uthaymīn (may ALLĀH have mercy on him) said: "As for the trials of dying; then the scholars have differed concerning it accordance to two opinions: The first opinion: is that the trials of dying is the questioning of the two Angels of the deceased in his grave with regard to his Lord and his religion and his Prophet. As for he whose Eemaan is pure, then the answer to this will be mad

Signed AlBaseerah Institute

1 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC105 viewsread 7 August 2026

SOME RULINGS REGARDING VISITING THE GRAVE Ibn Taymiyyah (may ALLĀH have mercy on him) mentioned: "Visiting the graves when the intent is to supplicate for the deceased, this is only done for those who died as believers. The type of visiting the graves which is an innovation is when the intent of the visit is to request needs from the deceased, or to request du'a or intercession from the deceased. It is, likewise, a

Signed AlBaseerah Institute

1 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC101 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

DISCUSSION OF THE INDIVIDUAL LETTERS AT THE BEGINNING OF SŪRAH ALLĀH says; الم (Alif Lam Mim) The individual letters in the beginning of some Surahs are among those things whose knowledge ALLĀH has kept only for HIMSELF. This was reported from Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali and Ibn Mas'ud. ... So glorious is HE Who made everything subtly reflect HIS wisdom. Moreover, the scholars said, "There is no doubt that ALLĀH

Signed AlBaseerah Institute

31 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC103 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

GOOD NEWS OF ALLĀH'S SUPPORT FOR THE BELIEVERS WHO ADHERE TO THE SUNNAH OF THE MESSENGER (ﷺ) ALLĀH said, يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ حَسْبُكَ اللّهُ وَمَنِ اتَّبَعَكَ مِنَ الْمُوْمِنِينَ O Prophet, sufficient for you is ALLĀH and for whoever follows you of the believers. That is, HE will take care of you and your followers among the believers. This is a promise from ALLĀH to HIS believing slaves who follow HIS Messeng

Signed AlBaseerah Institute

30 Jul 2026, 07:37 UTC120 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

THE COMMAND TO ASK ALLĀH OF HIS FAVORS ALLĀH said, وَاسْأَلُواْ اللّهَ مِن فَضْلِهِ And ask ALLĀH of HIS Bounty. That is, for everything that has to do with your religious or worldly affairs. Doing so is a sign of wisdom and of being blessed, in contrast to the one who fails to strive or relies on himself, not acknowledging his need of his Lord; or those who do both, in which case they are forsaken and are losers.

Signed AlBaseerah Institute

29 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC105 viewsread 7 August 2026

THE TIME LIMIT FOR SHAVING THE PUBIC HAIR It was narrated that Anas ibn Malik (may ALLĀH be pleased with him) said: "A time limit was set for us for trimming the moustache, cutting the nails, plucking the armpit hairs and shaving the pubic hair: that was not to be left for more than forty nights." {Muslim #258} An-Nawawi (may ALLĀH have mercy on him) commented: As for the time for shaving the pubic hair, the best i

Signed AlBaseerah Institute

29 Jul 2026, 20:58 UTC91 viewsread 7 August 2026

BE MINDFUL OF ALLĀH, HE WILL PROTECT YOU On the authority of Abu Abbas Abdullah bin Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) who said: One day I was behind the Prophet ﷺ [riding on the same mount] and he said, “O young man, I shall teach you some words [of advice]: Be mindful of ALLĀH and ALLĀH will protect you. Be mindful of ALLĀH and you will find HIM in front of you. If you ask, then ask ALLĀH [alone]; and if yo

Signed AlBaseerah Institute

29 Jul 2026, 08:52 UTC100 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ALLĀH IS THE BELIEVERS' GUARDIAN; WHAT AN EXCELLENT GUARDIAN! ALLĀH says: قُل لَّن يُصِيبَنَآ إِلَّا مَا كَتَبَ ٱللَّهُ لَنَا Say, Nothing will ever befall us except what ALLĀH has destined for us. That is, what HE decreed and wrote in al-Lawh al-Mahfūdh. هُوَ مَوۡلَانَا HE is our Protector. That is, HE is in charge of our affairs both religious and worldly, so we must accept HIS decree, for we have no control

Signed AlBaseerah Institute

28 Jul 2026, 19:06 UTC96 viewsread 7 August 2026

PRICE FOR TRUE LOVE Questioner: Someone who loves a person for the sake of ALLĀH, must he say, "I love you for the sake of ALLĀH," to him? Sheikh Al-Albāni: Yes, but loving for the sake of ALLĀH has a huge price, only very few people pay it. Do you know what the price for loving someone for ALLĀH’s sake is? Do any of you know the price? Someone present: The Most High said, وَٱلۡعَصۡرِ ۞ إِنَّ ٱلۡإِنسَـٰنَ لَفِی خ

Signed AlBaseerah Institute

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alBaseeroh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 273,139 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AlBaseerah” (@alBaseeroh), 2,030 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alBaseeroh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.