Возможность получить Free гифты Щас добавили там бесплатные паки из которых могут выпасть мишки, части гифтов и Даже редо. Так что можете покрутить. За приглашения дают доп. Паки и вам и рефу... Можете заходить и крутить - http://t.me/Giftydaobot?startapp=r_Block P.s. починили вывод мишек

Channel
𝘈𝘓3𝘐𝘕 𝘚𝘗𝘠𝘋𝘌𝘙
@al3inspyder
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
554subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002057520438 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @al3inspyder |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/al3inspyder |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 554 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 556 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 556 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 23.4%
- avg views ÷ 554 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 130
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.64%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 January 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 778 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 15s
- Average length
- 1m 15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
77 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 22.1% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 16.9% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 14.3% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 13.0% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 13.0% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 6.49% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 3.90% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 2.60% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 2.60% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 3,897
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 8
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 40%
- Most on one post
- 3,790
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @al3inspyder. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 January 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Внепланово планирую зайти на копейку https://web3.okx.com/ru/token/hyper/0xd0ee0cf300dfb598270cd7f4d0c6e0d8f6e13f29
❤1
Внепланово взял на копейку типо новый $Кешкат ток на чейне Stable... Ну купить его было непросто, поэтому я купил😁 Рефку Kiran укажите перед покупкой. Ну, а если серьезно купить токен будет непросто даже при желании.. https://basedbot.app/token/stable/0xeaf7ac0fdf150cdd89340fb762d83848de6a7b83 P.s. Dyor, не фин совет и т.д. я брал на копейку! планирую продавать на 9M$ Я фулл вышел если что
❤2
Видимо никому не нужна подписка гемини про)
😁2🔥1
Первые 3 человека кто сделает объем 40 $Gram по моей рефке получит подписку Gemini pro на ваш гугл аккаунт. В подписку входит: Antigravity, Veo 3.1, NanoBanano (крч все что входит в подписку Google pro...) Затраты на такой объем ~ 1$ может даже меньше... Если планируете крутить ради Подписки можете написать в ЛС уточнить есть ли ещё места или уже все разобрали... Кроме шанса получить redo - free, вы получите ещё …
🤣3❤2🔥2
Gifty Dao мини апдейт по их конкурсу Участников по прежнему не то что мало... Их практически нет... Ну максимум я думаю щас 2-3 участника, если не 0... Требования понизили! • За каждый 50 20 $Gram которые вы тратите/Вкладываете в дао(покупаете кусочек дорогого гифта) + 1 тикет • За каждые 25 10 $Gram, которые потратил/вложил в дао ваш реферал + 1 тикет. Затраты, если что на это дело реально около нулевые!!! Думае…
❤3👍2👎1
Шанс залутать Free редо без конкуренции... Конечно всё забыли про гифты и ждут новый АТХ, чтобы опять закупиться на хаях. Но все же... Запустилась новая аппка в тг - GiftyDao и у них стартовал конкурс на Redo... Конкуренции там нет от слова совсем. Условия там очень простые... Условия: • Купить майбах розового цвета; • Подарить владельцу канала все свои гифты просто так; • За каждый 50 $Gram которые вы тратит…
❤3😁1
Gpt начал что-то понимать...
🤣2🌚1🔥1
Лайт пост Щас жёстко шиллят $Arrow, так как они купили рекламу(На всякий случай объясняю, мало ли кто то этого не понял). Короче я бы на вашем скипнул этот движ! Там на Robinhood можно при желании найти что-то более интересное, чтобы полудить...
❤1
Знаете какой ревард я получил от @mrkt за то что во-первых пытался предупредить их о наличии бага через знакомых в этой сфере и через поддержку, а во-вторых вернул все средства которые вывел со своего аккаунта в полном объеме? Бан аккаунта и ответ в поддержке что будет рассмотрение которое продлится неопределенный срок)))) Самое забавное, что я сначала оставил из выведенного 350 тон, сказав что отдам их когда получ…
👍3😁1
Сделал акцент на награде в посте не из-за того что рассчитывал на какой-то профит, а показать абсурдность ситуации когда обещают награду, а дают блокировку на неопределенный срок Мне не интересна награда, нужны были бы деньги - я бы выводил как можно больше и друзей бы позвал это делать Чисто освещаю вам, чтобы вы понимали, что цитата «наеби ближнего своего иначе придет третий и наебет вас обоих» все еще актуальна …
🔥3
Это на самом деле самая конченная и тупорылая проблема текущих маркетов. Точнее не самих маркетов, а именно тг. Я думаю сделать проверку и разделение звёзд по их происхождению не составляет труда, но мозгов у тимы ТГ додуматься до этого не хватает
🤣5❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @al3inspyder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝘈𝘓3𝘐𝘕 𝘚𝘗𝘠𝘋𝘌𝘙” (@al3inspyder), 554 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/al3inspyder.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.