а еще такую красоту сделала моя мастер 💄 люблю своих котиков сильно на запись к ней: https://t.me/xOszO_nails
custom 52603812057522256977❤6custom 54071191757369189623💘2
Signed алисик в цепях🖇️

Channel
@al1ccept
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
68subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 25 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001209256882 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @al1ccept |
| Description | просто для друзей и знакомых вещаю о своей жизни + сборник сочных мемов |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/al1ccept |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 18:22 | 68 | no change |
| 25 Sept 2026, 17:47 | 68 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (11 August 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 140 |
| Reactions total | 33 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
169 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 38 | 22.5% | |
| custom 5260381205752225697 | 29 | 17.2% | |
| custom 5407119175736918962 | 27 | 16.0% | |
| ❤ | 22 | 13.0% | |
| 💘 | 16 | 9.47% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 4.73% | |
| 🕊 | 8 | 4.73% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 4.14% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.96% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 2.37% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 1.78% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.18% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
а еще такую красоту сделала моя мастер 💄 люблю своих котиков сильно на запись к ней: https://t.me/xOszO_nails
custom 52603812057522256977❤6custom 54071191757369189623💘2
Signed алисик в цепях🖇️
сегодня вайбик аутиста😣
❤9❤🔥3🔥1custom 52603812057522256971custom 54071191757369189621
Signed алисик в цепях🖇️
вчера долли партон,сегодня тим карри😭 rest in peace,legends 🙏🏻🕯️
🕊8💘2🙏2
Signed алисик в цепях🖇️
мой любимый опять меня балует и заказал портрет у моего любимого художника по мотивам клинка💜🥺 это было мега неожиданно,и как же я ахуела от количества деталей!! вы просто присмотритесь какая проделанная до мелочей работа 🖤 я супер в восторге, что особенно меня удивило это насколько у меня похожи здесь facial features…🙏🏻🙏🏻 mark, god bless your hands❤️ автор: https://t.me/markcellar подписывайтесь быстро на него!!!
❤🔥8custom 54071191757369189625💅4custom 52603812057522256974💘1🔥1
Signed алисик в цепях🖇️
еще одна новость, у моих родителей пушистое пополнение 🥹 ну я все равно считаю,что это моя собачка, я 11 дней валялась у родителей,болела ротовирусом,а эта кроха всегда была рядом со мной и меня подбадривала😭 ей всего 2 месяца, но она так быстро освоилась за 2 недели❤️🩹 теперь я в рядах собачников!!!
❤🔥11🎉5custom 54071191757369189625custom 52603812057522256972🔥1
Signed алисик в цепях🖇️
от этого трека непреодолимое желание рыдать (в хорошем смысле)🙏
👏5❤1💘1🔥1
Signed алисик в цепях🖇️
возьмите меня за руку,пожалуйста. 💔😭 эта новость с тизером салли погрузила меня ебать в какую ностальгию когда мне было 12-14 лет😔 осознавать,что уже прошло 10 лет…hits me so hard 😔
❤🔥7custom 54071191757369189625🆒3custom 52603812057522256973❤1🔥1
Signed алисик в цепях🖇️
а вот и фоточки подъехали 😢🖤 вот такие мы сладенькие и красивые,огромное спасибо конечно же @sofiveritas, она большая молодец и красотка, фотокарточки получились прекрасные, я прям очень рада!!🌟 ooh, i want you i don’t know if i need you but, ooh, i’d die to find out ⭐⭐⭐⭐🐾
💘10custom 52603812057522256977custom 54071191757369189627❤4❤🔥3🔥2
Signed алисик в цепях🖇️
вот и закончилось мини путешествие по питеру😭 жестко навайбили вчера в последний денек, встретились еще с подружаней, до невозможности приятные эмоции!!! будто появился глоток свежего воздуха, хочется теперь исследовать и другие места,но к сожалению только в следующем году…🙂 сейчас вернулись в бирюлево,на контрасте с питером, москва ощущается как полный пиздец, но это родной пиздец,так что двигаем дальше😎 всем спа…
❤🔥6custom 52603812057522256975🎉2❤1🔥1custom 54071191757369189621
Signed алисик в цепях🖇️
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @al1ccept. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“лисья нора🕳️” (@al1ccept), 68 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/al1ccept.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.