Channel
@akogoszakaz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
376subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001595216749 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @akogoszakaz |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/akogoszakaz |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 03:42 | 376 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 375 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 377 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 378 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 378 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
30 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 40.0% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 16.7% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥Конфликты в закупках: как сохранить контракт, деньги и отношения? Приемка, оплата, неустойки, односторонние отказы — любой из этих этапов может перерасти в штрафы, РНП и суды. А можно управлять спорами так, чтобы не терять партнеров и деньги? ‼️Да. Если смотреть на конфликт не как на войну, а как на задачу за столом переговоров. Приглашаем на шестой поток курса «Медиация в закупках». Старт — 14 сентября 2026. 16…
👍1
Самые опасные конфликты в компании — те, о которых никто не говорит 🫢 Большинство корпоративных конфликтов не начинаются с громкого скандала. Они рождаются гораздо раньше. ⚫️Когда одному сотруднику позволяют больше, чем другим. ⚫️Когда руководитель разговаривает с командой через давление. ⚫️Когда люди перестают доверять друг другу, но продолжают молчать. ➡️Именно с такими вопросами HR сталкивается каждый день. С…
👍2🔥2❤1👌1
«Кто защитит партнёрство, если каждый защищает только себя?» Когда два человека заходят в бизнес, им кажется, что главное — найти «своего» партнёра. Но проблема в том, что даже очень близкие люди по-разному понимают слово «вместе». ➡️Для одного — это свобода и доверие. Для другого — полная вовлечённость и запрет на любые сторонние проекты. ☝🏼Пока всё хорошо, эти различия не видны. Они всплывают позже — когда появл…
❤2👍2🔥2
Конфликты в компании неизбежны. Как ими управлять? Когда в организации нет системы работы с конфликтами, компания теряет гораздо больше, чем кажется на первый взгляд. Уходят сильные сотрудники, растет текучесть, руководители тратят время на решение личных споров вместо развития бизнеса, HR-команда работает в режиме постоянного тушения пожаров, а напряжение между подразделениями замедляет проекты и снижает эффективно…
🔥2
🤝ЦКМ АКО + АСКОЗА: вместе за цивилизованные банковские коммуникации ‼️Центр коммуникации и медиации Академии контрактных отношений (ЦКМ АКО) заключил договор о стратегическом партнерстве с Ассоциацией корпоративных заемщиков и специалистов по корпоративному кредитованию (АСКОЗА). АСКОЗА — это экспертный институт, специализирующийся на повышении эффективности взаимодействия и снижении конфликтности в системе «банк –…
👍3🔥2
Внутрикорпоративная медиация: Конфликты в компании не исчезают. Они становятся дороже ➡️ Если в компании больше 100 сотрудников, конфликты — это норма. Проблема начинается, когда руководители вынуждены решать их вручную, тратя время на разбор споров вместо развития бизнеса. ☝🏼 Но такие конфликты редко исчезают. Чаще они уходят «в тень»: появляются затянутые согласования, снижение мотивации, саботаж и увольнения. ❓…
🔥3❤2
🔥Стартует 5-й поток курса «Медиация в закупках: законодательство, инновации, практика»🔥 🗓️ 27–31 июля мы вместе с торговой электронной площадкой Сбер А запускаем уже 5-й поток курса, посвященного одному из самых перспективных инструментов современного закупочного процесса — медиации. За это время наш проект стал гораздо больше, чем просто образовательная программа. ✅ Проведено уже 4 потока обучения, объединивших з…
👍4🔥1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @akogoszakaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Центр коммуникации и медиации АКО” (@akogoszakaz), 376 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akogoszakaz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.