Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ✶ 𝙳𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚗 𝙷𝚘𝚞𝚜𝚎 ✶

Channel

✶ 𝙳𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚗 𝙷𝚘𝚞𝚜𝚎 ✶

@akira_demon_cosplayer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

135subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002077294602
TypeChannel
Username@akira_demon_cosplayer
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/akira_demon_cosplayer

Growth

1251351308 August 2026 — 125 subscribers9 August 2026 — 125 subscribers17 August 2026 — 135 subscribers8 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 124–137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 10:24135+10
9 Aug 2026, 02:46125no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:31125first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.1%
avg views ÷ 135 subscribers
Avg views / post
48.7
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held14 (4 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total682
Reactions total48
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
54s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2245.8%
🔥816.7%
🥰612.5%
👏36.25%
custom 536622385005910038724.17%
custom 536842227631419581512.08%
❤‍🔥12.08%
🍓12.08%
🍾12.08%
🏆12.08%
🕊12.08%
🦄12.08%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC17 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

За сегодня я ничего путного не делал, практически весь день спал, но вот вечером решил поработать с одним произведением. И вот некий спойлер по книге, что сейчас пока у меня в черновиках, хаха. В скором времени я сюда кину ссылку на книгу (возможно я её выложу ещё в Фикбук, но это пока неточно) По Жосяням думаю туда же выложу, хы. #щитпост

🔥3

7 Aug 2026, 20:23 UTC25 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Пошли по трендам, пхпх. #Чуя_Накахара #косплей #бродячие_псы

3

7 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC24 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ну и ещё и вспомните, как я выгляжу без косплея, ахах. #щитпост

2

7 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC27 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ🔤кованные одной цепью ㅤㅤ🔤вязанные одной целью ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤЗарисовка по книге. ㅤㅤВ мире культивации существовало множество легенд о родственных душах. Говорили, что когда-то, в начале времён, все души были едины, но потом раскололись на части и разлетелись по миру, чтобы найти друг друга в новых жизнях. И когда две половины встречались, между ними возникал резонанс — невидимая связь, которая не подчинялась ни времени

3

7 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC24 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Сейчас будет один пост, а именно видео в цивиле, ноо... С зарисовке по моей одной из книг, кхы. :") (Да да, я помню, что говорил о том, что вышлю следующую главу, и она будет, но чуть позже. У меня возникли некоторые накладки с ней, к сожалению.) Надеюсь, вам такой формат понравится. 👀 P. S. Также думаю его выложить на свой основной аккаунт в тик-токе, где у меня косплей, хах.. #щитпост

2

7 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC23 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Не теряйте, я решил поменять аву на канале, кхе. А также добавил пару новых реакций. ^^

2custom 53662238500591003872custom 53684222763141958151

5 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC34 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Даже не знаю, как на это реагировать: радоваться или же плакать. 😅 #щитпост

1

5 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC38 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

ㅤㅤ 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈 ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ😈😈 ㅤㅤ 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈 ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ 😈😈😈😈 ㅤㅤ ㅤ🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ㅤㅤ Обычный разговор соукоку. #Чуя_Накахара #Бродячие_псы #косплей

🥰31❤‍🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC29 viewsread 9 August 2026

Сегодня вечером будет рт, во сколько примерно пока не скажу. А ещё выйдет следующая глава "Созвучие пепла и лотоса".))) #щитпост

4 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC35 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤИнтерактив ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ🕊 — Какая AU ваша любимая? Хотели бы сделать в ней какого-либо персонажа? ㅤㅤНа первом месте у меня это, конечно же, AU!Ханахаки, потому что она очень сильно мне запала в душу ещё в моем подростковом возрасте. И естественно в данной ау я бы сделал всех существующих у меня персонажей, ахах. (Никто у меня со счастливым концом не бывает) ㅤㅤAU! Демоны и ангелы. Тоже не менее любимая и важная ау-шка,

2👏1🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC28 viewsread 9 August 2026

Давно у нас этого персонажа тут не было, хах.. #щитпост

4 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC31 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 ㅤㅤ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ🤩🤩🤩🤩 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤАкутагава стоит неподвижно, но внутри него — землетрясение. Каждое слово даётся ему с кровью, потому что он нарушает главное правило их отношений: не сомневаться в наставнике вслух. ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤОн прекрасно осознаёт, что переступает черту. Что Дазай может просто улыбнуться своей пугающей улыбкой и сказать, что он разочаровал его, — и это станет приговором по

🥰3🔥21

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @akira_demon_cosplayer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 523,252 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✶ 𝙳𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚗 𝙷𝚘𝚞𝚜𝚎 ✶” (@akira_demon_cosplayer), 135 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akira_demon_cosplayer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.