Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
𖹭 ˚ ꒰ ◌ port 𝅄 𝐀𝐊𝐈 ៸ ៸ ৎ୭
@akilend
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
243subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002313353803 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @akilend |
| Description | Ꮚ ♡ 𖥔 аки просто аки 𓈒 ꒰ 𝜗𝜚 ꒱ ◟ ᰋ ₊ ῾ own : @akichxs 09.09.24 info : @infoakich ◟ ✦ ————— ⌗ сотрудничаю : @Alternative_banners , @liliDeStorm |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/akilend |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 243 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 243 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 71.5%
- avg views ÷ 243 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 174
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 31.1%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (29 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,084 |
| Reactions total | 406 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 215
- Links
- 92
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
406 reactions across 6 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 7.88% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 32 | 7.88% | |
| custom 5422490197969370168 | 30 | 7.39% | |
| custom 5422714867708624901 | 29 | 7.14% | |
| custom 5271949300732038907 | 27 | 6.65% | |
| custom 5348509914576747413 | 27 | 6.65% | |
| custom 5188370839174682828 | 26 | 6.40% | |
| custom 5348356335136175800 | 26 | 6.40% | |
| custom 5413629482869235290 | 24 | 5.91% | |
| custom 5271848180022024490 | 23 | 5.67% | |
| custom 5445370708525874128 | 22 | 5.42% | |
| custom 5274107483143572893 | 21 | 5.17% | |
| custom 5415809926096263680 | 21 | 5.17% | |
| custom 5208495874807725599 | 14 | 3.45% | |
| custom 5346316036692015543 | 13 | 3.20% | |
| custom 5389061707295408568 | 13 | 3.20% | |
| custom 5188231037989198155 | 10 | 2.46% | |
| custom 5271720473464444951 | 8 | 1.97% | |
| custom 5348251224401539037 | 8 | 1.97% | |
| custom 5325538917649252893 | 6 | 1.48% | |
| custom 5345804214029286394 | 4 | 0.985% | |
| 7 further kinds | 22 | 5.42% |
Custom emoji. 19 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 406reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @akilend. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
⠀⠀ꗃㅤ⨾ 卡᭝ tim.e t.ea ♡ ↷ ⛾ ɞㅤ ¡ ⠀⠀♡ 𖥨 time: 02:10 h 𖥧 ne.w pos.t ! ⠀⠀☒ 𖠢 price 50 ₴/☆ :💐 ⩆ ʕ•̫͡•ʔ 𖧧 ଓ ⠀⠀ᕱ ᕱ ଓ ⸼ #akichxs , #order ᛬ 𖣠
custom 520849587480772559914custom 534631603669201554313custom 538906170729540856813custom 54225272678321038073💋1💘1
❌❌❌❌❌❌🤩𝑖𝑎𝑟-🤩𝑜𝑠𝑡🤩 Луна никогда не бывает одинаковой, но она всегда прекрасна, ❌❌ ❌Здравствуйте-здравствуйте, давно искали хорошего дизайнера с низкими ценами? ❌❌❌Тогда обязательно загляните к Флури! 🔤🔤Что вы сможете увидеть, перейдя на канал? Различную практику, всё, что нужно о заказах и самое главное — отзывы! ❌❌❌ А свет, что отражает луна сможет позже указать вам верный путь, даря возможность стать уникальным.
хотим ?? 🍀
💘5
Sticker, posted without a caption
⠀⠀ꗃㅤ⨾ 卡᭝ tim.e t.ea ♡ ↷ ⛾ ɞㅤ ¡ ⠀⠀♡ 𖥨 time: 03:10 h 𖥧 ne.w pos.t ! ⠀⠀☒ 𖠢 price 80 ₴/☆ : 🤩 ⩆ 12 в ком ⠀⠀ᕱ ᕱ ଓ ⸼ #akichxs , #order ᛬ 𖣠
custom 541362948286923529024custom 544537070852587412822custom 541580992609626368021custom 54450778948355008573custom 54539568678416252623
Sticker, posted without a caption
⠀⠀ꗃㅤ⨾ 卡᭝ tim.e t.ea ♡ ↷ ⛾ ɞㅤ ¡ ⠀⠀♡ 𖥨 time: 02:51 hㅤ𖥧 ne.w pos.t ! ⠀⠀☒ 𖠢 price 80 ₴/☆ :❤️ ⩆ ʕ•̫͡•ʔ 𖧧 ଓ ⠀⠀ᕱ ᕱ ଓ ⸼ #akichxs , #practice ᛬ 𖣠
custom 542249019796937016830custom 542271486770862490129custom 534835633513617580026custom 53482512244015390378custom 54246769118486543174custom 53842476674318609133💘2💋1
Sticker, posted without a caption
⠀⠀ꗃㅤ⨾ 卡᭝ tim.e t.ea ♡ ↷ ⛾ ɞㅤ ¡ ⠀⠀♡ 𖥨 time: 00:40 h 𖥧 ne.w pos.t ! ⠀⠀☒ 𖠢 price 15 ₴/☆ :🎐 ⩆ ʕ•̫͡•ʔ 𖧧 ଓ ⠀⠀ᕱ ᕱ ଓ ⸼ #akichxs , #order ᛬ 𖣠
custom 527194930073203890727custom 527184818002202449023custom 527410748314357289321custom 52717204734644449518custom 54538691646094431374
Sticker, posted without a caption
⠀⠀ꗃㅤ⨾ 卡᭝ tim.e t.ea ♡ ↷ ⛾ ɞㅤ ¡ ⠀⠀♡ 𖥨 time: 01:11hㅤ𖥧 ne.w pos.t ! ⠀⠀price 50 ₴/☆ : 😀 ⩆ tutorial 𖧧 ଓ ⠀⠀ᕱ ᕱ ଓ ⸼ #akichxs , #practice ᛬ 𖣠
custom 534850991457674741327custom 518837083917468282826💘24custom 518823103798919815510custom 53255389176492528936custom 53458042140292863944
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @akilend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 54,946 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@saltyckBASE · 734 postsᨦïᨩ info . akich ౨ৎ
@infoakich · 143 posts⇉ 𝂅ׄ. 𓈒𝓑𝒍𝒖𝒆ृ𝑚͟𝑜͟𝑜𝑛𝓑𝒍𝒖𝒆 ִ ʾʾ ঌঌ ִֺ۪ | оформление, эмодзи, стикер паки на заказ
@BmB1488 · 732 posts𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗐𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽 | DW
@deswrld · 5272 posts꒰ ꒱ UWASA °ち help ᰍᰍ
@UWASAhelp · 1,1022 posts—· 𝘃𝗲𝗲 port𝒇
@veeportf · 202 postsINFO CHINMOKU
@CHINMOKUUUSINf0 · 781 post𝐃𝐂 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧🦇
@DCCONFESSIONN · 1,2481 postDC Pairings confessions
@DCpairingscf · 1331 post𓈒 ִ۫ 𝆺𝅥𝆺𝅥 ׄ 𝅄 ͟͟𝙳𝚎𝚜𝙲𝚘𝚕𓈒 . ۫🗒𓈒 ۫ꪫ
@Des_Collab · 271 post𐙚ׄ𓌔ׅ 𝐃𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇 𓌔𐙚
@designcf · 3,0971 post⥂ ♡ 𝗗𝖾͟𝗌͟𝗂͟𝗀𝗻𝖾𝗋𝗌 𝗖𝗈͟𝗇͟𝖿͟e𝘀𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇 ⋮ ☔️
@designerscf · 2,0251 postархив:: @ 𝓓ɪꪮɴꪗᴀ ⋮ ᴘꪮʀᴛ︖﹖
@dionya_port · 881 postㅤㅤ݃ 𝓶𝐫𝐮𝐯 ׅ 𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒐
@forkfucker · 261 post(!!) 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗼 #
@InfoVezalyDes · 151 post𝐽𝑜𝑘𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛
@Jokerconf11 · 1291 postKaori's Navigation
@kaorissnav1gation · 61 post𝗹𝗶𝗹𝗶 ⧼𝘿𝙚𝙨𝙞𝙜𝙣⧽ 𝙎𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙢
@liliDeStorm · 6281 post𝑀𝑒𝑙𝑓.𝑖 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡
@melfi_port · 131 post‧₊ Pixel ꔛ ꒰ Pushers ꒱
@thePixelPushers · 2261 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𖹭 ˚ ꒰ ◌ port 𝅄 𝐀𝐊𝐈 ៸ ៸ ৎ୭” (@akilend), 243 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akilend.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.