Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for на блядках

Channel

на блядках

@akidnod

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

591subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001664652015
TypeChannel
Username@akidnod
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/akidnod

Growth

5895915907 August 2026 — 590 subscribers8 August 2026 — 590 subscribers8 August 2026 — 589 subscribers15 August 2026 — 591 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 589–591 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:18591+2
8 Aug 2026, 10:32589-1
8 Aug 2026, 03:18590no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:32590first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.0%
avg views ÷ 591 subscribers
Avg views / post
331
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (2 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,640
Reactions total100
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
50s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54179350329646353532929.0%
custom 52830830843238983782222.0%
custom 54178438593988742391616.0%
custom 53458976854025333411010.0%
custom 53594326993102641151010.0%
custom 530579364302450555766.00%
custom 528949058711902394744.00%
custom 545428663543060433133.00%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 00:27 UTC213 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

привет, спишь?) привет, поставишь лайк во фло?)

custom 541793503296463535318custom 53458976854025333419custom 54178438593988742391

4 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC320 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

а прикиньте влог с др монтируется))) а прикиньте он еще и выйти может)) возможно даже бесплатно 🤫

custom 541784385939887423912custom 54179350329646353534

3 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC440 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

на ближайшие 4 дня забудьте, пожалуйста, лелю, как интернет-персонажа, я ушла жить в лес и посыпать голову пеплом🙏

custom 52894905871190239473

2 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC403 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

запредельная концентрация красивых девушек на корабле ❤️

custom 528308308432389837816custom 535943269931026411510custom 54179350329646353536custom 54178438593988742391

2 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC335 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53057936430245055572custom 52894905871190239471custom 54178438593988742391

2 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC305 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

сегодня на нишевом

custom 54178438593988742391

2 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC316 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52830830843238983781custom 53057936430245055571custom 54179350329646353531

2 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC304 viewsread 8 August 2026

по-моему отличное подтверждение поста мы щас увидели в этом чате

2 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC299 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

в очередной раз убеждаюсь, что нет ничего более хрупкого, чем мужское эго.

custom 52830830843238983783custom 53057936430245055573

2 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC308 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

перебор чет с социализацией за последнюю неделю, хочу в лес.

custom 54542866354306043313custom 52830830843238983782custom 53458976854025333411

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @akidnod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“на блядках” (@akidnod), 591 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akidnod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.