Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Maryam_akbari psychologist

Channel

Maryam_akbari psychologist

@akbari_psycologist

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

328subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002222951274
TypeChannel
Username@akbari_psycologist
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/akbari_psycologist

Growth

3263283276 August 2026 — 326 subscribers6 August 2026 — 326 subscribers13 August 2026 — 328 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 326–328 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:46328+2
6 Aug 2026, 21:48326no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:23326first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
73.4%
avg views ÷ 328 subscribers
Avg views / post
241
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (8 December 20255 August 2026)
Views total1,445
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1260.0%
👍840.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC43 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📚 کتاب‌خوانی در کلینیک ساتراپ گاهی آنچه بیش از هر چیز ما را خسته می‌کند، تضادهایی است که در درون خود حمل می‌کنیم. در اولین جلسه کتاب‌خوانی کلینیک ساتراپ، کتاب «تضادهای درونی ما» اثر کارن هورنای را با هم می‌خوانیم، درباره مفاهیم آن گفت‌وگو می‌کنیم و می‌بینیم چگونه می‌توان از آن در زندگی روزمره بهره برد. اگر به خودشناسی، رشد فردی و درک عمیق‌تر از ذهن و احساسات خود علاقه‌مند هستید، خوشحال می‌شویم همراه ما باشید. 🌿📖

👍2

27 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC142 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

روانشناس حیطه کودک و نوجوان 🔹فرزند پروری 🔹مهارت های زندگی 🔹مشاوره پیش از ازدواج 📍کلینک ساتراپ زندگی

1

2 Jan 2026, 12:13 UTC≈2,520 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🚨 نکته‌های لازم برای والدین در زمان بحران و ناامنی (ویژه کودکان) در شرایط بحرانی، کودکان قبل از هر چیز به آرامش و رفتار ما نگاه می‌کنند، نه فقط به حرف‌هایمان. 🧠 1. آرامش خودتان را مدیریت کنید کودک اضطراب را «حس» می‌کند. حتی اگر نگران هستید: جلوی کودک اخبار را دنبال نکنید از صحبت‌های پرتنش و شایعه‌آمیز دوری کنید 👂 2. به کودک اجازه حرف زدن بدهید احساساتش را بی‌قضاوت بشنوید جملاتی مثل «چیزی نیست» یا «نترس» را کم

3

2 Jan 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,750 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

✍در مواقع جنگ و بحران با کودکان خود چگونه صحبت کنیم: 🌈 وقتی دنیا کمی ترسناک می‌شود… (پیامی برای بچه‌ها) گاهی وقت‌ها ممکن است اتفاق‌هایی بیفتد که باعث شود بچه‌ها احساس ترس، نگرانی یا سردرگمی کنند. این احساس‌ها کاملاً طبیعی هستند و خیلی از بچه‌های دیگر هم همین حس‌ها را دارند. 💛 یادت باشد: تو تنها نیستی. 🧸 چند نکته مهم برای وقتی که می‌ترسی: اگر دلت گرفت یا ترسیدی، با یک بزرگ‌تر مطمئن حرف بزن؛ مامان، بابا، معلم یا کسی ک

👍21

29 Dec 2025, 08:16 UTC177 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @childrentherapyVideo

⁨ پدر هستی و می‌خوای ارتباط سالم‌تر و عمیق‌تری با فرزندت بسازی؟ 👶 @childrentherapy

1

25 Dec 2025, 07:14 UTC874 viewsread 6 August 2026

آیا «داشتن مهارت‌های زندگی» معادل «داشتن سلامت روان» است؟ خیر، ولی به‌شدت با هم مرتبط‌اند. طبق تعریف سازمان بهداشت جهانی، سلامت روان یعنی: حالتی از بهزیستی که فرد در آن توانایی‌های خود را می‌شناسد، می‌تواند با استرس‌های معمول زندگی کنار بیاید، کار مفید انجام دهد و در جامعه مشارکت داشته باشد. 🔹 مهارت‌های زندگی ابزارهای عملی رسیدن به سلامت روان‌اند، نه خودِ سلامت روان. مثال: • کسی ممکن است اضطراب یا افسردگی نداشت

25 Dec 2025, 07:14 UTC840 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

آیا می‌شود گفت اکثریت جامعه سلامت روان ندارند؟ پاسخ علمی دقیق: 🔹 اکثریت جامعه اختلال روانی ندارند 🔹 اما اکثریت جامعه به سلامت روان بهینه نرسیده‌اند 🔹 دلیل اصلی: • نبود آموزش مهارت‌های زندگی • فشارهای مزمن اجتماعی • فرهنگ هیجان‌گریز و گفت‌وگوگریز 📌 مهارت‌های زندگی: • شاخص «کیفیت سلامت روان» هستند • نه معیار تشخیص بیماری روانی ⸻ 🔑 جمله کلیدی جامعه‌ای که مهارت‌های زندگی را آموزش نمی‌دهد، انسان‌های «ناسالم» تو

4

24 Dec 2025, 07:45 UTC119 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @childrentherapyVideo

وقتی سرزنش مزمن می‌شود، بدن کودک به‌عنوان رسانه‌ی اضطراب عمل می‌کند. رفتارهایی مانند تکان دادن پا، بی‌قراری حرکتی، وول خوردن مداوم یا دست‌کاری پوست و ناخن، در بسیاری از موارد به‌اشتباه به‌عنوان «بی‌تربیتی» یا «لجبازی» تفسیر می‌شوند. در حالی‌که از منظر روان‌شناسی تحولی، این نشانه‌ها اغلب بازتاب فعال‌شدن سیستم اضطرابی کودک هستند. سرزنش‌های مکرر، به‌ویژه در سال‌های اولیه رشد، سیستم عصبی خودمختار کودک را در وضعیت تهدید

2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @akbari_psycologist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 589,627 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Maryam_akbari psychologist” (@akbari_psycologist), 328 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akbari_psycologist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.