Channel
@akafeng_broadcast
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
75subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001225527985 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @akafeng_broadcast |
| Created | 26 April 2018 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/akafeng_broadcast |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 75 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 76 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 75 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:40 | 75 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 26 April 2018 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2018. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
昨晚更新至今，有小伙伴提到这图失去了本身比较的意义，有点盲目吹捧 Telegram 的意思。 实际上是因为大家都在提 Telegram 的优点，我没有采集到竞品太多缺点，我只能以 Telegram 来写 QQ / 微信的对比，因此造成了一种吹捧 Telegram 的感觉。 凭我一个人的力量是很难合适和更新好这张对比图的，希望各位小伙伴能给我更多一些反馈，谢谢大家 (鞠躬 反馈与建议请联系 @AkaFeng
三大聊天工具 QQ、微信、Telegram 特性对比图 时隔 4 个月再次更新，感谢各位小伙伴们的帮助
Canonical 今天正式宣布推出 Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver) 操作系统。 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BionicBeaver/ReleaseNotes
刚刚 @LetITFly 反馈了一些错误的地方，已重新修正校对，在此表示感谢 如有转载，建议同时转发此条消息做更新，以免误导他人
三大聊天工具 QQ、微信、Telegram 特性对比图 感谢 @cckn007 的帮助 提醒：我们的记者跑的没有香港的媒体快，故此图存在报道上的偏差，请以广播站后一条消息中的对比图为准
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @akafeng_broadcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@akafeng_broadcast named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小黄蜂的广播站” (@akafeng_broadcast), 75 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akafeng_broadcast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.