看过痴迷 - https://movie.douban.com/subject/37450627/
Signed IFTTT

Channel
@airingchannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
343subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001985885978 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @airingchannel |
| Description | Airing 的频道 公众号: Airing Blog: ursb.me Twitter: @airingursb TG 交流群: t.me/airinggroup |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/airingchannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 343 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 343 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (8 June 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 357 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
27 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 15 | 55.6% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
看过痴迷 - https://movie.douban.com/subject/37450627/
Signed IFTTT
🌙 Kimi 已开始向用户推送 K3 模型,最高支持 1M 上下文。 Kimi 🌸 在花频道 · 茶馆水群 · 投稿通道
🔥2
又用完一管,这次很节约了,Fable 只用来 plan,够用 2 天。下一个号走起。
烧完了,开第二个号🍴
🔥4
看过我会找到你 - https://movie.douban.com/subject/37133963/
Signed IFTTT
今中午刚开的 20x 账号,用了 fable 的 81%,已经很节制了😢
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Signed IFTTT
看过抓娃娃 - https://movie.douban.com/subject/36653918/
Signed IFTTT
💬 微信灰度测试原生 AI 助手“小微” 微信正在小范围灰度测试原生 AI 助手“小微”。用户可通过文字或语音与小微对话,让它帮忙调整设置、发消息、打电话等微信原生功能。 该助手目前接入多个 AI 模型,包括腾讯自研模型和开源优质模型。测试覆盖多个系统,用户能否参与以实际页面显示为准。 新京报贝壳财经 🌸 在花频道 · 英文频道 · 投稿通道
HTTP 拟新增 QUERY 方法:带请求体的安全查询 IETF HTTP 工作组正在制定一项草案,新增 HTTP QUERY 请求方法。它允许像 POST 一样把查询条件放在请求体里,但具有 GET 的安全和幂等特性,便于缓存、重试和自动恢复。 QUERY 主要解决 URI 查询字符串太长的问题,并定义了 Accept-Query 响应头,让服务器声明支持的查询格式。草案仍在讨论中,当前版本将于 2026 年 12 月到期。 HTTP Working Group 🌸 在花频道 · 英文频道 · 投稿通道
个人网站 380 多号人同时在线 按小时峰值 UV 3K+ 查了下,原来是周末的文章在 HN 上激发了网友们的讨论
🔥7
看过铁拳教育 - https://movie.douban.com/subject/37071123/
Signed IFTTT
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @airingchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Airing Channel” (@airingchannel), 343 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/airingchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.