If $ASTER reclaims this liquidity area at the POC + VWAP, there's a nice opportunity for a potential swing long.

Channel
Ains Redemption
@ainsnews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
72subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002932669039 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ainsnews |
| Description | https://x.com/AinsDaez |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ainsnews |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 72 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:49 | 72 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 23 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 366
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 25
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 3s
- Average length
- 3s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 29 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
$AAVE [Update] Flipping the POC into support at the 75% Fibonacci level + anchored VWAP + daily timeframe… I mean, it’s an obvious long setup. I’ll wait for price to lose these levels and then reclaim them before triggering my long. Of course, I’ll share my entry here if it happens.
$GOLD [Update] Looking for a pullback to confirm the ABCD pattern for a potential long setup.
Photo, posted without a caption
$BTC [Daily Plan] Clear rejection from the local VAH overnight. Price is now attempting to S/R flip the POC. [Longs] $75,900 seems like a solid support area. I’d like to see a drop to the nPOC followed by a fast reclaim. $73,750 / $73,150 also look good for long setups. [Shorts] On the medium timeframe, there isn’t much confluence for shorts… I don’t think $81k will be the top. This is the main reason I’m lean…
❤3
Worst decision I made this year.
I think $HYPE is the new $SOL. BUT @hyenatrade is the WORST perps DEX EVER. I had a short on $ZEC with my stop-loss at 605. I got stopped out on hyENA 😂 This is actually criminal, bro. Wtf. If you’re trading on hyENA, get out ASAP.
Lets see if $ETH can give us the long setup
This three dives pattern could bring the long setup we want on $AAVE
$NPC is giving me the same feeling $BRETT gave when it started to warm up...
$AAVE review https://x.com/AinsDaez/status/2047686239873085583?s=20
Non-Playable Coin Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 Spent: 22.3 WETH ($51,522.67) Got: 6,046,544.13 NPC Buyer Position: ⬆️ 81.89%! Buyer Holdings: 13,429,958.15 NPC ($118,127.84 🐳) Buyer Funds: $145.1 DEX: UniSwap (V2) Holders Count: 19,248 Price: 0.000003807 WETH ($0.008796) MarketCap: $70,803,970 TX | Swap | Chart | Trending
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ainsnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ains Redemption” (@ainsnews), 72 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ainsnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.