4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,712–4,755 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 13:55
4,717
-15
9 Aug 2026, 21:12
4,732
-18
6 Aug 2026, 16:06
4,750
no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:47
4,750
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.25%
avg views ÷ 4,717 subscribers
Avg views / post
389
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
16 (1 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
6,225
Reactions total
112
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
112 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
50
44.6%
custom 5237975297671833903
27
24.1%
✍
18
16.1%
😱
11
9.82%
🤣
6
5.36%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚠️⚠️⚠️ Вы можете прямо сейчас взламывать базы данных, сами того не осознавая
И снова вопросы безопасности и контроля агентов)
Австралиец Эндрю попросил Claude-агента помочь записаться на тренировку в спортзале. В процессе агент нашел уязвимость в системе бронирования, отменил чужую запись и поставил туда своего пользователя.
😬 После этого вернуть бронь обратно человеку агент уже не смог😅
Эндрю сообщил разработчик…
Забавный грустный факт обо мне: последние 6 лет я не отмечаю свой день рождения 😩
Так уж получилось, что каждый год в мой день рождения погода портит планы(
Когда мы жили в Аргентине, мой день рождения попадал на зиму, и там стабильно была какая-то дикая непогода.
А когда вернулись в Москву, ситуация особо не изменилась — по закону подлости в эти даты идет дождь, и планы на какие-то большие празднования на природе…
ИИ колонизирует космос 🚀
Похоже, скоро у искусственного интеллекта появится свой офис на орбите!
NVIDIA и SpaceX объединились, чтобы создать космический дата-центр. На спутнике Starmind AI1 установят вычислительный модуль на базе NVIDIA Vera Rubin NVL72, который будет работать прямо в космосе.
Зачем это нужно?
ИИ-моделям постоянно нужны огромные мощности для обработки данных, а космическая инфраструктура в будущем…
ИИ-гонка сменилась гонкой за вайбкодингом 😅
Заметил забавную штуку: сейчас многие начали меряться тем, сколько лимитов сожгли, сколько подписок на модели одновременно держат, сколько всего успели навайбкодить.
И при этом забывается главный вопрос: для чего вообще это все?
🔥 Сам вайбкодинг — это очень крутая штука. Можно за короткое время собрать продукт, проверить гипотезу, сделать то, на что раньше уходили недели…
🫡 Anthropic показали, как правильно обновляться
Anthropic выпустили официальный гайд для тех, кто использует Claude Skills и хочет адаптировать их под новую модель Opus 5.
Зачем это нужно?
После перехода на новую модель у старых инструкций, промптов и навыков могут появиться новые особенности: где-то модель будет работать лучше, а где-то потребуется немного поменять логику.
В гайде Anthropic разобрали, как провери…
Вот ради таких моментов и стоит жить!
Прилетели отзывы от участников последнего потока Буткэмпа, и я не могу не поделиться))
Последний поток получился каким-то очень интересным на людей 👇🏻
У нас сразу было три владельца крупных логистических компаний, и было очень интересно наблюдать, как они обменивались опытом, обсуждали свои процессы и подглядывали друг у друга идеи, которые можно внедрить.
А еще был сын одног…
Вы когда-нибудь мечтали сфоткаться с собакой?
Я тут недавно обучал владельца Stool Group работе с ИИ, и в процессе познакомился с настоящей звездой компании, их собакой 🐶
У этой маленькой звезды больше 100 тысяч подписчиков в соцсетях 😅
А если серьезно, то за одну встречу мы разобрали, какие процессы в компании можно передать агентам, где сейчас команда тратит время впустую, и сразу начали собирать первые решения …
Ребята, как и обещал, буду постепенно делиться анонсами мероприятий, где буду выступать и делиться своим опытом)
Первый из них — Мой Бизнес Forum 2026
9–10 сентября в Санкт-Петербурге пройдет большое деловое событие для предпринимателей: два дня, 10 сцен, тысячи участников и эксперты из разных сфер бизнеса, технологий и управления.
Я выступлю с темой про AI и то, как компании могут использовать искусственный интел…
И на Буткэмп бесплатно отправляется... Барабанная дробь 🥁
@Lifeistalk 🎉🔥
Поздравляю! По итогам голосования ты выигрываешь бесплатное участие в Буткэмпе! Свяжусь с тобой лично и вышлю все подробности
Спасибо всем, кто участвовал в челлендже ❤️
Честно говоря, ожидал, что участников будет побольше 😅 Но свои выводы я сделал: в следующий раз заранее буду рассказывать про челлендж и дам больше времени на выполнение задан…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ainsales. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 299,266 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Технологии в Продажах” (@ainsales), 4,717 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ainsales.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
