【杭州修车协会】 群里大量现金红包、白嫖福利、水群奖励等你来拿! 协会: https://t.me/hzxc666666 收录杭州优质老师,高质量狼友 每月现金出击补贴!白嫖应有尽有!

Channel
嘉儿的后宫
@ainiaini520too
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,251subscribers
+975 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004357131634 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ainiaini520too |
| Created | 30 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ainiaini520too |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 1,251 | +1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 1,250 | +13 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 1,237 | +16 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:34 | 1,221 | +879 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 342 | +66 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 276 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 276 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 17.4%
- avg views ÷ 1,251 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 218
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.416%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (30 July 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
| Views total | 872 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 17s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🎰 杭州修车协会福利【嘉儿】 📮 参与条件: 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-嘉儿的小窝 🎫 加入-杭州修车协会抽奖公告 🎫 加入-杭州修车协会 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 10 条 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 单P6折优惠券 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 刷屏、灌水、纯表情、复制粘贴、无意义对话、撤回内容等,一律视为无效发言,不计入统计!请用心交流。 开奖如果不在群内,一律视为自动放弃,奖品将会回到奖池继续抽奖活动最终解释权归本群管理团队所有。 中奖的人员核实元宝数量,开奖即查,达到200扣除后再联系老师约定约时间(在抽奖期间提交过本群老师原价出击报告可以不扣除直接兑奖),元宝不够奖品作废回到兑换区供其他狼友兑换 24小时内预约时间,3天内出击,过时自动作废 中奖需本人出击,转让需经过老师同意并与管理协商,不得私下买卖,出现买卖双方都将被踢出群里!出击完成后提交报告(提交报告额外奖励元宝)如若不提交,将永久拉黑! 老师:@vbvb520…
❤1
看起来很萌 实际上也很萌😋
#杭州肯德基 https://t.me/kdjqjt #好评 80-100 #中好评 65-80 #差评 0-65 【出击时间】:20260823 【出击老师】:嘉儿 【联系方式】:@vbvb520 【出击留名】:布鲁斯 【开课位置】:拱墅区 【修车水费】:1000p 【人照评分满分10】:8 人照比较符合 【颜值评分满分20】:19 颜值还是非常抗打的 【身材评分满分10】:10 B-C的胸,手感真不错 【吊感评分满分20】:19 紧,润,水真多 【服务评分满分10】:10 女友感十足,感觉又恋爱了 【态度评分满分20】:20 会主动拉着去洗澡,擦身子,doi时也会帮着擦汗 【环境评分满分10】:8 日租房 【综合评分满分100】:94 情绪价值描述: 【过程描述】:有的打✅ 舌吻 口活 ✅ 69舔穴 毒龙 【过程描述】: 前序: 鸭王非常温柔,嘉儿夸你了。 正文: 今天心情好,寻思着给这次cj过程取个题…
❤1
休养生息一周😳
萌是我的外表 忧郁是我的性格😋
#杭州肯德基 https://t.me/kdjqjt 【出击时间】:8.9 【出击老师】:嘉儿 【联系方式】:@vbvb520 【出击留名】:杭州鸭王 【开课位置】:上城 【修车水费】:工兵 【人照评分满分10】:7分,照片p过,我去的时候又是素颜,可以参考验证视频,我觉得是好看的 【颜值评分满分20】:20 我觉得今年出击颜值前三,耐看 【身材评分满分10】:10梨形身材 不胖 有肉刚好,屁股贼有弹性,没想到的,熊也正正合适,没有一点下垂 【吊感评分满分20】:207很紧,水也多,老师两年前才破处,懂得都懂(户型/紧度/水量/包裹感) 【服务评分满分10】:8嫩妹三件套,女友感,女上很舒服(流程化/女友感/三件套) 【态度评分满分20】:20 态度也很好,很主动,情绪价值也提供很多(主动询问/自觉服务) 【环境评分满分10】:公寓10(日租房/公寓/高档小区) 【综合评分满分100】:95(以上相加) 情绪价值描述: 【过程…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
小名:嘉儿 身高 162 体重 93 年龄 21 🐻 B+ 内容: 🛀 亲咪咪 调晴 挑逗 窃窃私语 🐻蓷 指划 丝袜 情趣 无 T口 👅🥚深入交流(必须打伞)各种姿势配合 纯天然 无科技 无纹身 邻家小妹 皮肤白皙 温柔甜美 耐心不催 女友感十足 课费:1000/1(45分钟以内) 1800/2 (90分钟以内) 外出先付路费 太远的话可能去不了哦 酒店不去 不视频,不口嗨,服务中途出水算一次 拒绝酗酒嗑药无套 SM 拔套偷拍三通巨无霸 联系方式:@vbvb520 双向机器人:@vbvbvb520bot
❤4
Channel created
Channel photo updated
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ainiaini520too. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“嘉儿的后宫” (@ainiaini520too), 1,251 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ainiaini520too.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.