Обычная подписка Все мои секреты в спорте, питании, красоте и отношениях в одном месте. Супер польза в дружелюбной атмосфере близких по духу ❤️

Channel
AINA VAR | Фитнес
@aina_varr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,267subscribers
-265 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001151884964 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aina_varr |
| Created | Between 1 February 2019 and 31 August 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aina_varr |
Topic
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 18,267 | -17 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 18,284 | -8 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 16:14 | 18,292 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:05 | 18,300 | -18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:02 | 18,318 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:05 | 18,328 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 18,339 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 18,350 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 18,356 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:59 | 18,363 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 18,364 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 18,365 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:09 | 18,370 | -21 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 18,391 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 18,396 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 18,406 | -16 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 18,422 | -10 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 18,432 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 18,428 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 18,438 | first reading |
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.40%
- avg views ÷ 18,267 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 987
- 29 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.98%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 29
- of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 49 (29 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 28,628 |
| Reactions total | 499 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 16m 52s
- Average length
- 28s
Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
863 reactions across 43 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 292 | 33.8% | |
| ❤ | 257 | 29.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 212 | 24.6% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 3.24% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 2.43% | |
| 😍 | 14 | 1.62% | |
| 🥰 | 14 | 1.62% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 1.16% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 0.811% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 0.348% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.348% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.116% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.116% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 863 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 49 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aina_varr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Сегодня - заключительный день, когда можно присоединиться к FAT ZERO 🔥 FAT ZERO - это тот самый пинок, чтобы вернуть режим, питание и тренировки в систему, а форму - туда, где она вам нравится 🍑 Сегодня закрываем набор. Кто хотел с нами - ваш последний вагон 🚂🔥👇🏾 https://ainavar.com/fatzero
❤7🔥4❤🔥2
☄️НАПОМИНАЛКА: остались последние сутки FAT ZERO FAT ZERO - наш жиротопный интенсив, который помогает: — вернуть режим и контроль над питанием — убрать летние «накопления» 😅 — подсушиться и привести форму в порядок — тренироваться по понятной системе, а не по настроению — и главное - снова почувствовать, что вы управляете своей формой, а не она вами 🍑 Без голодовок, марафонов на выживание и обещаний начать новую жи…
🔥4❤🔥3❤1
Вот так однажды ты просто начинаешь тренировать людей онлайн… а потом выясняется, что у тебя друзья по всему миру 🥰 И самое смешное, когда мы оказываемся в одном городе, вопрос «увидимся?» даже не стоит. Вопрос обычно другой: «А потренироваться вместе когда?» 😂 Мы можем месяцами быть по разные стороны экрана, разбирать технику, ругаться на недоделанные повторы, радоваться новым весам и результатам, а потом встречае…
🔥23❤🔥11🥰4😍3
🔥 BACK TO FORM FAT ZERO - НАБОР ОТКРЫТ Пока все традиционно собираются «начать новую жизнь с 1 сентября», мы решили сделать иначе 😁 Не начинать в сентябре. А войти в сентябрь уже в режиме. BACK TO FORM FAT ZERO - это наш интенсив для тех, кто за лето немного расслабился в питании, режиме и тренировках и сейчас хочет быстро собрать всё обратно. Без голодовок. Без «убираем углеводы и страдаем». Без попытки за 5 дне…
❤13👍3
Обычная подписка Все мои секреты в спорте, питании, красоте и отношениях в одном месте. Супер польза в дружелюбной атмосфере близких по духу ❤️
Дошла в румынке до 85 кг. А дальше что? 100? 120? Тут можно уже в тяжелоатлеты податься 😂 Очень хороший вопрос от вас. Потому что рано или поздно наступает момент, когда постоянно накидывать вес уже некуда. Точнее, можно. Но тогда румынская тяга постепенно превращается в соревнование «кто сегодня первым отвалится - поясница, хват или техника» 😁 И вот здесь важный момент: рост рабочих весов не равно рост ягодиц в …
❤🔥10❤5👍3
НЕ БОЛИТ - НЕ РАСТЁТ? 🍑 Вот это правило я бы уже торжественно проводила на пенсию 😁 До сих пор многие оценивают тренировку так: на следующий день села на унитаз без помощи рук - всё, тренировка была слабая 😂 А если спускаешься по лестнице боком и проклинаешь тренера -ягодицы точно растут. Спойлер: мышечная боль вообще не является главным показателем хорошей тренировки. Можно убиться новым упражнением, получить …
🔥12😁11❤🔥3❤1
Ну что, пока лидирует А 😁 И да, это мой любимый вариант. Не потому что «можно всё и ничего не будет» 😂 А потому что человек, у которого реально выстроена система, не боится одного дня вне её. Пропустила тренировку - ничего не случилось. Поела вкусно - тоже ничего. Полежала тюленем - ягодицы за ночь не испарились 🦭🍑 А вот самым коварным для меня здесь был вариант Г: «я бы всё равно пошла тренироваться». Потому чт…
🔥12❤🔥9❤4👍1
У меня к вам сегодня маленький тест на адекватность 😁 Представьте: Вы всю неделю нормально питались, тренировались, всё по плану. И тут наступает воскресенье. Вы НЕ идёте в зал. Едите что-нибудь просто потому, что вкусно, а не потому что там идеально сошлись КБЖУ. Валяете тюленя полдня 🦭 Ваши дальнейшие действия: А) кайфую, завтра спокойно возвращаюсь в режим 😎 Б) где-то к вечеру начинаю подозревать, что пресс…
❤🔥2❤1
По многочисленным просьбам я записала рецепт 🤗 это бесподобно вкусно 🤤 скоро 🔜 в AV секретах. То, что отправляется с доставкой по мск вообще не может сравниться с реальными, традиционными осетинскими пирогами.
❤15
Почему не растут ягодицы? 🍑 Вот вроде тренируетесь. Мост делаете, отведения делаете, румынку уже полюбили как родную 😁 А 🍑 как будто вообще не в курсе, что у вас на неё большие планы. И вот тут я обычно начинаю задавать вопросы. Вы вообще когда-нибудь анализировали свои тренировки? Не просто «я хожу в зал 4 раза в неделю», а КАК вы тренируетесь? Что с техникой? Рабочие веса растут или третий год плюс-минус одно и…
❤🔥13❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @aina_varr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что вам больше всего мешает изменить форму?
- Не знаю, что делать13%
- Тренируюсь - 🍑 не растет38%
- Нет системы38%
- Начинаю и бросаю35%
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@withusmanovakate · 55,606
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
@sveta100_sv · 64,238
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 August 2026
@nikiforov_t · 35,127
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AINA VAR | Фитнес” (@aina_varr), 18,267 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aina_varr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.