Channel
@aightyfxcopy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
76subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003858548466 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aightyfxcopy |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 19 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aightyfxcopy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 76 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 75 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 76 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:11 | 76 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
67 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 34 | 50.7% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 26.9% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 7.46% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 5.97% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 4.48% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 1.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 22 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hallo meine Lieben, die letzten Wochen waren für mich persönlich die anstrengendsten am Markt, die ich je erlebt habe. Aufgrund des Konflikts mit dem ständigen hin und her war es schwierig technisch gute Einstiege und Ausstiege zu finden und oftmals kamen nur kurze Bewegungen. Leider hat es vorallem dadurch die neuen von Euch getroffen, die sich angekoppelt haben. Wir haben den ersten Monat gut gestartet gehabt mit 6…
🔥5🙏3👍1🥴1
Hallo zusammen, momentan macht uns der Kollege etwas zu schaffen, was nicht zuletzt auch natürlich etwas News getrieben ist mit dem ständigen hin und her von Krieg und Frieden. Seit 6 Wochen nun in Folge legt der so eine steile Leistung hin ohne jegliche Zwischenkorrektur. Die 28.300 waren eine technisch wichtige Zone, die er jetzt auch aus dem Nichts wieder nach oben zersägt. Das wird erstmal der letzte Trade sein. …
❤4
Ich wünsche euch eine schöne Handelswoche. Werde mich auf den geeigneten Einstieg im EURUSD fokussieren. Am Freitag wurden wir leider nur ausgesweept. Ohne SL wären wir zur Markteröffnung heute Nacht schön im Profit gewesen. Es sieht weiterhin Short aus für mich. Das als kleine Info
❤7
Im Konflikt haben sich neue Dinge ergeben, sodass der Markt letztendlich sehr bullish darauf reagiert hat. Die Woche schliesst erstmal mit knapp 0,9% im Minus. Nächste Woche musst dann erstmal umgedacht werden. Schönes Wochenende🙏🏽
👍2
Hallo zusammen, kurze Info: Ich werde jetzt EURUSD und NASDAQ Shorts aufbauen. Ich sehe großes Potenzial für eine Abwärtsbewegung. Möglich, dass die Bewegung heute nicht zu sehen sein wird, sondern erst nächste Woche🙏🏽
🔥4🤣1
Der Link zum Registrieren ist in der angehefteten Nachricht oben🙏🏽
🔥1
Hallo zusammen, bis zum 12.04. habt ihr die Möglichkeit 10% Rabatt auf die FundedAccounts bei TegasFX zu erhalten! CODE: EASTER10 Gerne dürft ihr Euch dem Copytrading wie viele andere bereits auch anschliessen:) Ich wünsche euch frohe Ostern🙏🏽
🔥1
Der NASDAQ Trade jetzt läuft mit 0,6% Risiko - kann aber sehr nice werden. Falls dieser nicht aufgehen sollte ist für diese Woche Schluss. Morgen ist Feiertag und daher wenig Bewegung.🙏🏽🫶🏽
🔥3
Guten Morgen, so wacht man gerne auf mit knapp 1,5% auf der Uhr über Nacht😎
🔥4❤2🍾1
Ich habe für den EURUSD Trade erstmal Feierabend gemacht und warte auf neue Einstiege. 2,4% sind somit drin heute🙏🏽
👏4❤1
1,6% bislang heute. Die restlichen Positionen halte ich erstmal und evtl. erwischen wir noch einen schönen Nasdaq Einstieg🔥🔥
🔥4
Guten Morgen, leider hats durch die 2x Manipulationen seitens Trump etwas gedauert letzte Woche. Ich habe nun erstmal 1,1% abgesichert im EURUSD und baue neue größere Positionen auf, damit auch die neu gekoppelten von Euch in dem Trade dabei sind🙏🏽 Wünsche eine erfolgreiche Handelswoche💪🏽
🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aightyfxcopy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 379,329 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AIGHTY.FX - COPYTRADING” (@aightyfxcopy), 76 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aightyfxcopy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.