Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 哀悼

Channel
@aidaoiloveu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,427subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003819607811 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aidaoiloveu |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aidaoiloveu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 1,427 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 1,430 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 1,434 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 1,434 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,807 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
12 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 41.7% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 哀悼
真正的圈子早就死早24年
👍2👎1
Signed 哀悼
现在封号圈玩微信的打个高危或者违规当💯来卖 拿别人掉了的号再提一次当反馈 玩qq的抓战场违规当wwg拿去卖 拿直举掉的条子号称新路子 玩抖音的拿大违规号当wwg 把作品p掉就当思路去卖 玩快手的更别提了 随便拿陈年老路子打掉一个就当自己是封号神😂 还有那个玩tg封禁的就是抓大违规频道提交啊 25年五月你哥就在玩了😂😂
Signed 哀悼
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 哀悼
柔情似水
Signed 哀悼
好孤单
Signed 哀悼
15 苏州 一个人
Signed 哀悼
没有人给我点秋天第一杯奶茶
👍4
Signed 哀悼
照我的德行 我死后应该会自己在家里闷半个月都没人发现
Signed 哀悼
玩了这么久互联网我总结出来了几个点 1.没能力的人最爱展示人脉巴结别人 2.表面兄弟最喜欢在你有路子的时候来找你 3.所有人都只为了钱 没人真正想和你玩啊
Signed 哀悼
一群玩封号圈玩互联网玩魔怔的网混子 玩你们的狗逼圈子去吧 一群野狗 老子不玩了操你妈逼😂😂😂
Signed 哀悼
我现在谁都不想联系了 看透你们的嘴脸 一个个展示做人😂
❤2
Signed 哀悼
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aidaoiloveu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 201,238 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“恨海情天” (@aidaoiloveu), 1,427 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aidaoiloveu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.