Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 网黑

Channel

网黑

@Sadlynl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

425subscribers

+186 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003994826584
TypeChannel
Username@Sadlynl
Created23 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Sadlynl

Growth

2394253327 August 2026 — 239 subscribers8 August 2026 — 239 subscribers8 August 2026 — 245 subscribers15 August 2026 — 425 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +186. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 211–453 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:24425+180
8 Aug 2026, 17:36245+6
8 Aug 2026, 09:49239no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:03239first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
80.2%
avg views ÷ 425 subscribers
Avg views / post
341
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held14 (23 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,430
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC77 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

8.7漂流公益思路 苹果抓包公益思路不做任何解释 举报通道:色情口对面三条 接口:74 58 反馈:@plylwabc 公益频道:https://t.me/Sadlynl

Signed 漂流

6 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC126 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

8.6漂流公益思路 苹果抓包公益思路不做任何解释 举报通道:色情口对面两条 接口:74 58 反馈:@plylwabc 公益频道:https://t.me/Sadlynl

Signed 漂流

5 Aug 2026, 03:40 UTC191 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

8.5漂流公益思路 苹果抓包公益思路不做任何解释 举报通道:色情口对面三条 接口:74 58 反馈:@plylwabc 公益频道:https://t.me/Sadlynl

Signed 漂流

4 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC248 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

8.4漂流公益思路 苹果抓包公益思路不做任何解释 举报通道:色情口对面两条 接口:74 58 反馈:@plylwabc 公益频道:https://t.me/Sadlynl

Signed 漂流

4 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC261 viewsread 8 August 2026

专心经营这个频道 人数到达一定程度公益大家伙想要的回应答案 有频道有群组的转发转发

Signed 奶龙

3 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC291 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

8.3漂流公益思路 苹果抓包公益思路不做任何解释 举报通道:色情口对面两条 接口:74 58 反馈:@plylwabc 公益频道:https://t.me/Sadlynl

Signed

2 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC297 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

出售v百 无视新老号 有质保新手小白上手就会 联系: @plylwabc

Signed

2 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC283 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

8.2漂流公益思路 苹果抓包公益思路不做任何解释 举报通道:色情口对面两条 接口:74 58 反馈:@plylwabc 公益频道:https://t.me/Sadlynl

Signed

23 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC840 viewsread 8 August 2026

不管哪个平台路子都会慢慢泛滥 只要人数到达一定目的 有频道的可以去发到自己频道宣传宣传 有群组的可以发去群组宣传 小白有不会的地方不懂的地方可以大胆来问我 @loveTvTa

Signed 奶龙

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Sadlynl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTCAnonymous Poll209 voters

想玩什么平台路子

  1. 微信31%
  2. 快手22%
  3. QQ11%
  4. 抖音55%
  5. 小红书9%

The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 166,643 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“网黑” (@Sadlynl), 425 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sadlynl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.