Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

AI Pulse

@ai_pulse

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

670subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001533257337
TypeChannel
Username@ai_pulse
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ai_pulse

Growth

6707 Aug 2026, 20:07 — 670 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:33 — 670 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:078 Aug 2026, 02:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 669–671 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 02:33670no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:07670first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 22 December 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
57
Links
56

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2356.1%
1843.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2023 to 13 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 May 2024, 17:23 UTC≈1,530 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

mac端可以通过语音交互,读取剪贴板,直接上位替代了siri 另外鉴于win端cortna完全失败的情况下gpt客户端的推广会毫无阻力

4👍2

Signed Steven Lynn

13 May 2024, 17:11 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 8 August 2026

OpenAI新模型gpt-4o 免费给所有用户使用

Signed Steven Lynn

8 May 2024, 10:58 UTC≈1,230 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#AI评论 之前和文心一言的PM、Growth Leader,以及智谱的用研负责人聊了聊: 1. 大家知道的 Kimi 的增长策略、内部消息都似乎印证了杨植麟大概率是想卷钱就走的; 2. 大家对于 智谱AI 的未来都很乐观,认为智谱的 ToB 会做的不错; 3. 大厂们的 AI 基座属于苟延残喘阶段; 4. 大部分的创业项目(例如聊到的 Dify.AI),由于来钱来的太快,导致Founder会有误解,没有把商业模式完全想通就开始做; 5. 大家公认国内厂商中底座能力最强的是 智谱AI。 6. 从360 AI 的DAU 快速增长来看,ToC目前还没出现杀手级应用 欢迎在评论区讨论。

Signed Marvin Cui

14 Apr 2024, 08:47 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

今天去了 智谱AI 主持活动,办公室很豪华,不知道频道里有没有在智谱工作的朋友~

Signed 浡然 崔

11 Mar 2024, 06:49 UTC≈1,620 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

插播广告:需要 Moonshot 内推找我哈~

👍3

Signed Marvin / 龙诚

7 Mar 2024, 13:30 UTC≈1,390 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Next Stop: Moonshot 月之暗面 ➡️ 感谢大家的支持,以后会给大家带来更多的一手信息 👀 最后“推销”下我司产品: kimi.ai

👍17

Signed Marvin / 龙诚

17 Feb 2024, 11:50 UTC≈1,530 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#小道消息

Signed 𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙫𝙞𝙣 𝘾𝙪𝙞 【iState Menus 3/5 😭】

16 Feb 2024, 01:12 UTC≈1,260 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#新闻速报 OpenAI 发布文生视频大模型 - Sora 🔗 链接: Twitter

3

Signed 𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙫𝙞𝙣 𝘾𝙪𝙞 【iState Menus 3/5 😭】

28 Jan 2024, 09:49 UTC≈1,440 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#新闻速报 ChatGPT开启了语言内测 目前支持: Deutsch English (US) Español (España) Français (France) Italiano 日本語 Português (Brasil) Русский 简体中文 繁體中文(台灣)

Signed 𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙫𝙞𝙣 𝘾𝙪𝙞 【iState Menus 3/5 😭】

3 Jan 2024, 02:22 UTC≈1,430 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Hi 大家好,转眼间又过去了一年。 我们 AI Pulse 由于各位编辑个人的时间原因,从定期的周报更新转为了不定期的新闻/技巧更新。 我有一些话想跟大家来聊聊: AI Pulse, Founder : @MarvinCui 在过去的一年里,我曾在 FlowGPT 中兼职过一阵 Marketing,为我积累了一些经验。后来由于学业原因就辞退了。 现在我在一个初创团队中尝试做中小学的 AI 科普。我所在的团队在去年的 12 月底到了昆明的一所中学跟同学们分享了如何使用文心一言来创作小说,同学们的反馈非常好。一直在底下喊“牛逼”。 我有幸成为了在比较早期就接触了市场化的 LLM/AI 绘画的一批人。实话说,这既和我“爱折腾”有联系,也和我的家庭支持有一定的关系。 但那些位于互联网并不那么发达的孩子们,可能就无法通过自己来尝试这些最新的 AI 技术。他们需要一个“入口”。 而我恰巧又是一名高二学生,相对来说年龄差距也比

11

Signed 𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙫𝙞𝙣 𝘾𝙪𝙞 【iState Menus 3/5 😭】

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ai_pulse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 299,546 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AI Pulse” (@ai_pulse), 670 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ai_pulse.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.