大家好,TaskMonitor 已在 CNB / GitHub 发布,这是一款运行在 Windows 11,可在任务栏常驻监测系统负载并从进程维度追踪负载情况的小工具。欢迎下载支持一下,也欢迎多点点 Star,谢谢! https://cnb.cool/linesoft2/TaskMonitor https://github.com/linesoft2/TaskMonitor
😁8🤡6❤4🤔2

Channel
@Pandownload1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,032subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001289886135 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Pandownload1 |
| Description | 网盘交流 |
| Created | 19 December 2018 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Pandownload1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 9,032 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 9,039 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 9,040 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 19 December 2018 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (19 December 2018 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,850 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
390 reactions across 12 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 150 | 38.5% | |
| 👍 | 78 | 20.0% | |
| 🤔 | 50 | 12.8% | |
| 😁 | 24 | 6.15% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 3.85% | |
| 🤯 | 14 | 3.59% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 2.82% | |
| 🫡 | 11 | 2.82% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 2.05% | |
| 💩 | 7 | 1.79% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 1.54% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.769% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 0.769% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.513% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.513% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.513% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.256% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.256% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.256% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.256% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 390reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2018 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
大家好,TaskMonitor 已在 CNB / GitHub 发布,这是一款运行在 Windows 11,可在任务栏常驻监测系统负载并从进程维度追踪负载情况的小工具。欢迎下载支持一下,也欢迎多点点 Star,谢谢! https://cnb.cool/linesoft2/TaskMonitor https://github.com/linesoft2/TaskMonitor
😁8🤡6❤4🤔2
最新消息,火绒稍后就会更新解决此问题
🤡17❤3👍2👏2
今晚,有众多用户发现自己的 Windows 尤其是 QQ NT 卡顿,目前 QQ 已确认是火绒今晚更新后与 QQ NT 等 Electron 应用不兼容导致,正在联系解决中,如出现该问题,可尝试暂时关闭火绒。
🫡11👍3
Photo, posted without a caption
🥰11🤯7💩3🌚2😱2❤1👀1
欢迎加入字节跳动青训营,字节跳动面向大学生的前后端训练营,请使用我的专属链接报名: https://juejin.cn/activityregister/7236177108368572475/info?utm_source=campus-6928
🤡29🤔14👍3❤1
在鸿蒙4.0上尝试运行了最新的鸿蒙IDE编译出来的鸿蒙App,发现它和之前运行在Android上的套壳App不一样,这次好像真的是和Android相互独立的,具体体现在: 1.LibChecker等Android App中找不到这个App 2.通过无障碍抓取Activity抓不到这个App的Activity 但是,通过adb shell pm list package是可以找到这个App的,不过adb shell pm path所获取到的路径中又找不到base.apk🤔
🤔32🤡17👍7😁5🥱1
没工作😭(意向:前端实习,地点:北京)
🤡47👍7❤1
(有人会8086汇编吗,救我🥺)
🤯7🤡6🤣1😁1
AI Pulse 周报#1|欢迎进入AI纪元 🔗 链接:官网 💡 文章内容: - 近期科技新闻 - 近期AI工具推荐 - 小结 频道介绍: 📶 你好,这里是AI Pulse,一个专注AI领域的周报 在每周五晚,我们会为您推送: - AI领域的最新动态资讯 - 最新的优秀AI工具 - 我们的一些个人看法 频道|群组
😁10👎8👍5❤4🤔2
ChatGPT应该是被阻断了(DNS污染)
🤡28🎉3🤬3
Pan Download pinned a photo
近期看到不少朋友还在讨论Pandownload,今天我也就再次提醒一下,Pandownload目前处于暂停维护状态,开发者目前深陷官司,所以不存在什么复活版、修复版、源码等等,源码泄漏你们就别开玩笑了,配合👮♀️调查是每个公民的义务,懂法律的就知道,👮♂️调查取证也是有规章制度的,源码泄漏就等于玩忽职守。我偶尔还看到一些群友讨论某宝某多某鱼有什么pandownload付费加速脚本,我只想说你要是愿意做冤大头那我也没法,但是出问题的时候就请去找卖家。 好了,愿大家一切安好,希望开发者也能浴火重生,凤凰涅槃!🐯
👍51😢6💩4🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Pandownload1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 975,013 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pan Download” (@Pandownload1), 9,032 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pandownload1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.