2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22–24 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 12:03
23
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:02
23
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 1 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
7
Videos
17
Links
4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
9m 37s
Average length
1m 04s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
66 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💩
28
42.4%
👍
27
40.9%
🔥
5
7.58%
❤
4
6.06%
👏
1
1.52%
🤡
1
1.52%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2025 to 12 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ai_beeing. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2025 to 12 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Это будет довольно скучный пост, но поделиться им я хочу. Возможно эта информация кому-то будет интересной.
Была у меня проблема:
в разделе YOUR APPS сайта GOOGLE AI STUDIO после очередного обновления UI в "корпорации добра" перестал отображаться вертикальный скрол.
Он нужен, потому что на странице выводится список из 40+ приложений, а в поле зрения попадает от силы 10. Но это пол беды, что скрол исчез, он не прост…
Иногда ловится вайб и хочется что-то простое, быстрое и атмосферное сделать, потому что, например, песня понравилась.
Так произошло и в этом случае. Клипом это не назову.. просто мини-видео для сопровождения.
Ролик состоит из двух частей.
1️⃣ Первая часть — презентация персонажа. Я старался раскрыть его характер и манеру держаться. К производству подошёл подготовленным как смог: сделал разбивку на реплики, продумал ракурсы для монтажа, отрендерил всё в банане. Для эмоций персонажа подготовил отдельные чарты. Подготовка заняла ощутимую долю времени, но позволила КРАТНО сократить количество генераций и приблизиться к нужн…
На входе ролик с аварийным шкафом, Что с ним? Почему так? Никто не знает.
Кроме меня. Во втором ролике всё встало на свои места. Реальное видео очевидцев.
Для атмосферы добавляю саундтрек из новой нейросети для генерации музыки - https://www.tunee.ai/ - я скормил её первый кадр и попросил сделать походящий под него инструментал. Звёзд с неба не хватает, но как эксперимент на проверку способностей сервиса, почему нет.
Серьезного ничего не опубликую, но вот очередное баловство. Случайное фото с крайнего севера промелькнуло в одном из чатов. Оно было превращено в фото колонизации планеты и затем в видео. Очередное баловство)
Для интересующихся промт из СОРЫ (сделано три генерации, одна ушла в бан, вторая подошла, третья брак.. можно было две сделать):
Изобрази сцену из фантастического фильма про колонизацию безжизненной ледяной пла…
Возможность визуализации нейронками шуток и приколов, которые возникают в голове, это одно из самых типичных развлечений которым я себя иногда радую.
Обычно происходит это так: вижу мем или смешной видос, который изрядно доставляет, а потом понеслось))
Вот как в этом случае: смешной видос > прикол с того, как чел грациозно флексит > клуб > генерация / монтаж / звук
Для меня это сродни тому, как съесть в охоту вкус…
Хотя это уже всё пережёвано много раз, не могу в очередной раз не отметить насколько же невероятно мощные штуки умеет сора.
Невозможно, мне кажется, не удивиться тому, как описанный текстом визуал превращается в полноценную, идеально отснятую сцену готового фильма со вниманием буквально к каждой детали промта.
То что сделала СОРА - это буквально то, что я себе представлял в плане монтажа, постановки и т.п. эта сцен…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ai_beeing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НЕЙРОБЫТИЕ / ОПЫТ / ПРОМТЫ” (@ai_beeing), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ai_beeing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.